ArticleTherapeutic advances in rare disease
Emerging roles and opportunities for rare disease patient advocacy groups.
Article in Therapeutic advances in rare disease. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 50 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
50 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Capturing Real-World Rare Disease Patient Journeys: Are Current Methodologies Sufficient for Informed Healthcare Decisions?Journal of evaluation in clinical practice · 2025Pooled it
- Societal participation in the development of orphan drugs: a systematic review.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Pooled it
- Caring for Rare Genetic Disease: A Vision for the Future.Journal of genetic counseling · 2026Article
- Preparing Genetic Counselors for Advocacy Partnerships: A Novel Internship Model.Journal of genetic counseling · 2026Article
- Ethical Governance of Open Data Across Biomedical Research, Healthcare, and Public Health: Privacy, Equity, Trust, and Controlled Access.Health care analysis : HCA : journal of health philosophy and policy · 2026Article
- Exon-skipping therapies for DMD in Kazakhstan: Progress and challenges.Journal of neuromuscular diseases · 2026Article
- From patient advocacy to patient-driven research: Building active partnerships beginning at the bench to reach the bedside.FEBS open bio · 2026Article
- Awareness and perceptions of patient and public involvement in rare disease research in Japan: the role of patient advocacy groups and family members.Research involvement and engagement · 2026Article
- Advancing the measurement of caregiver impact: Data collection priorities aligned with caregiver, health technology assessment, and policy stakeholders.Journal of managed care & specialty pharmacy · 2026Review
- Transition Care for Young People with Rare Bone and Mineral Conditions: A Scoping Review.Advances in therapy · 2026Article
- Vulnerability, protection and fairness: ethical and regulatory limits in small-N gene therapy trials.Trials · 2026Article
- 'If You Don't Fight for Yourself, No One Else Will': An In-Depth Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis of Rare Disorder Care Advocacy in Aotearoa New Zealand.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2026Article
- Targeting the Unmet Need in Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors: A Contemporary Review of Investigational Clinical Trials and Therapeutic Landscape.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Patient organizations involvement in healthcare: a rapid review and conceptual framework.Globalization and health · 2026Review
- Response to 'Non-profits wade in where for-profit life science investment fears to tread'.Nature biotechnology · 2026Article
- "We are ambassadors, we are advocates": rare disease patient advocacy groups as knowledge brokers across health and social systems-a qualitative study from Poland.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Stigma, Scarcity and the Price of Legitimacy: Chronic Pain Advocacy and the Politics of Pharmaceutical Partnerships in Canada.Sociology of health & illness · 2026Article
- Significance of Advocacy Group Meetings for Rare and Intractable Diseases: A Survey of Joubert Syndrome and Related Disorders in Japan.Progress in rehabilitation medicine · 2026Article
- Assessing rare disease understanding: a novel disease readiness level framework.Orphanet journal of rare diseases · 2025Article
- Navigating gastrointestinal challenges in genetic myopathies: Diagnostic insights and future directions.World journal of methodology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: Patient advocacy groups (PAGs) serve a vital role for rare disease patients and families by providing educational resources, support, and a sense of community. Motivated by patient need, PAGs are increasingly at the forefront of policy, research, and drug development for their disease of interest. Objectives: The study explored the current landscape of PAGs in order to guide new and existing PAGs on available resources and challenges to research engagement. We aim to inform industry, advocates, and healthcare personnel about PAG achievements and ways they are increasingly involved in research. Design: We chose PAGs from the Rare Diseases Clinical Research Network (RDCRN) Coalition for Patient Advocacy Groups (CPAG) listserv and the National Organization for Rare Disorders (NORD) 'Find a patient organization'. Methods: We surveyed eligible PAG leaders about the demographics, goals, and research activities of their organization. For analysis, PAGs were bucketed by size, age, prevalence of disease, and budget. Data were de-identified for cross-tabulation and multinomial logistic regression analysis with R. Results: Research engagement was an extremely important goal for most PAGs (81%), though ultra-rare disease and high-budget PAGs were most likely to cite it as the top priority. In total, 79% reported research engagement in some capacity, including registries, translational research, and clinical trials. 'Ultra-rare' PAGs were less likely than 'rare' PAGs to have an ongoing clinical trial. Conclusion: While PAGs of varying sizes, budgets, and maturity levels reported an interest in research, limited funding and lack of disease awareness continue to create barriers to achieving their goals. While support tools exist to make research more accessible, often their utility depends on the funding, sustainability, maturity of the PAG itself, and the level of investment of collaborators. Despite the availability of current support systems, there are challenges related to both the start-up and sustainability of patient-centric research efforts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.