Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37197546›Full record

ArticleJournal of thoracic disease2023

Impact of delayed transition off intravenous vasoactive agents for aortic dissection on intensive care unit length of stay.

Noelle De Leon, Gabriela Young, Dexter Wimer

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of thoracic disease, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 40% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Noelle De LeonDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Gabriela YoungDepartment of Pharmacy Services, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Dexter WimerDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
University of California, San Francisco · USCedars-Sinai Medical Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The initial management of acute aortic dissection centers around rapid control of blood pressure and heart rate, commonly requiring initiation of continuous intravenous (IV) antihypertensive agents and intensive care unit (ICU) admission. However, there is limited guidance for when and how to transition off IV infusions to enteral agents, potentially extending ICU length of stay (LOS) in stable patients who are otherwise ready for floor transfer. The objective of this study is to compare the impact of rapid Methods: In this retrospective cohort study of 56 adult patients admitted with aortic dissection requiring IV vasoactive infusions for >6 hours, patients were grouped by time required to fully transition from IV to enteral vasoactive agents. Patients who transitioned in ≤72 hours were considered the "rapid" group, and the "slow" group required >72 hours to fully convert. The primary endpoint was ICU LOS. Results: For the primary endpoint, the median ICU LOS was 3.6 days for the "rapid" group, compared to 7.7 days in the "slow" group (P<0.001). The "slow" group required a significantly longer duration of IV vasoactive infusions (115.7 Conclusions: In this study, rapid transition to enteral antihypertensives within 72 hours was associated with a shorter ICU LOS without an increase in hypotension.

Indexed as

antihypertensiveAortic dissectionintensive care unit (ICU)length of stay (LOS)

Identifiers

PMID37197546
PMCPMC10183551
OpenAlexW4328003521

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.