Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37197516›Full record

ArticleJournal of thoracic disease2023

Codeine prescription pattern and treatment responses in patients with chronic cough: a routinely collected institutional database analysis.

Ji-Yoon Oh, Yu Ri Kang, Jin An, Eugene Choo, Ji-Hyang Lee, Hyouk-Soo Kwon, Jae-Seung Lee, Sei Won Lee, Tae-Bum Kim, Yeon-Mok Oh and 3 more

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of thoracic disease, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Camlipixant in Refractory Chronic Cough: A Phase 2b, Randomized, Placebo-controlled Trial (SOOTHE).American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine · 2025
    Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Assessment of Epidemiological Data and Surveillance in Korea Substance Use Research: Insights and Future Directions.Journal of preventive medicine and public health = Yebang Uihakhoe chi · 2024
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Ji-Yoon OhDepartment of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Yu Ri KangDepartment of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Jin AnDepartment of Pulmonary, Allergy and Critical Care Medicine, College of Medicine, Kyung Hee University Hospital at Gangdong, Kyung Hee University, Seoul, Korea.
Eugene ChooDivision of Allergy and Immunology, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA.
Ji-Hyang LeeDepartment of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Hyouk-Soo KwonDepartment of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Jae-Seung LeeDepartment of Pulmonology and Critical Care Medicine, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Sei Won LeeDepartment of Pulmonology and Critical Care Medicine, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Tae-Bum KimDepartment of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Yeon-Mok OhDepartment of Pulmonology and Critical Care Medicine, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
You Sook ChoDepartment of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Sang-Do LeeDepartment of Pulmonology and Critical Care Medicine, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Woo-Jung SongDepartment of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Asan Medical Center · KRUlsan College · KRUniversity of Ulsan · KRIcahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Codeine has been long used as an antitussive drug in several countries. However, a prescription pattern of codeine, such as dose or treatment duration, has not been reported in detail. Furthermore, there is few scientific evidence on the efficacy and safety. We aimed to examine codeine prescription pattern and explore treatment response in patients with chronic cough in real-world practice. Methods: This was a retrospective cohort analysis of patients with chronic cough who were newly referred to tertiary allergy and asthma clinics between July 2017 and July 2018. Routinely collected electronic healthcare records (EHRs), including medical notes, prescriptions, and outpatient visits, were analyzed. Codeine prescription records were examined for duration, mean daily dose, and 1-year cumulative dose. Codeine responses were evaluated by manual EHR reviews. Results: Among a total of 1,233 newly referred patients with chronic cough, 666 were prescribed codeine for a median [interquartile range (IQR)] of 27.5 days (IQR 14-60 days); the median daily dose was 30 mg/year (IQR 21.6-30 mg/year), and the 1-year cumulative dose was 720 mg/year (IQR 420-1,800 mg/year). About 14.0% of patients were prescribed codeine for >8 weeks; they were older and had a longer cough duration, throat abnormal sensation and less dyspnea than patients prescribed codeine for ≤8 weeks or who did not receive codeine. Codeine prescription and duration was positively associated with the number of other cough-related medications, diagnostic tests, or outpatient visits. Cough status change was noted in 61.3% of codeine-prescribed patients (as 'improved' in 40.1% and 'not improved' in 21.2%), but not documented in 38.7%. Side effects were described in 7.8%. Conclusions: Codeine prescription may be frequent and chronic in real-world practice of patients with chronic cough, despite the lack of robust clinical evidence on the efficacy. High prescription rates suggest unmet clinical needs. Prospective studies are warranted to identify codeine treatment responses and safety, and to build up clinical evidence to guide appropriate use of narcotic antitussives.

Indexed as

antitussiveCodeinecoughreal-world evidenceroutinely collected data

Identifiers

PMID37197516
PMCPMC10183498
OpenAlexW4366968137

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.