Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37197443›Full record

ArticleInnovation in aging2023

Predicting Older Adults' Continued Computer Use After Initial Adoption.

Shenghao Zhang, Walter R Boot

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Innovation in aging, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.1field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Shenghao ZhangDepartment of Psychology, Florida State University, Tallahassee, Florida, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3870-1975
Walter R BootDepartment of Psychology, Florida State University, Tallahassee, Florida, USA.
Florida State University · US

Funding

Understanding Issues Surrounding Technology Uptake and the Influence of Technology and Decision Making in Older AdultsP01AG017211 · NIA · WEILL MEDICAL COLL OF CORNELL UNIV · PI CHARNESS, NEIL · 1999 to 2019
$26.6M
The Adherence Promotion with Person-centered Technology (APPT) Project: Promoting Adherence to Enhance the Early Detection and Treatment of Cognitive DeclineR01AG064529 · NIA · FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY · PI BOOT, WALTER RICHARD, CHAKRABORTY, SHAYOK · 2019 to 2023
$3.2M
NIA NIH HHS P01 AG017211NIA NIH HHS R01 AG064529
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and Objectives: Sustained computer and internet use have the potential to help older adults in various aspects of their lives, making predicting sustained use a critical goal. However, some factors related to adoption and use (e.g., computer attitudes) change over time and with experience. To understand these dynamics, the current study modeled changes in constructs related to computer use after initial computer adoption and examined whether these changes predict continued use. Research Design and Methods: We used data from the computer arm ( Results: Results demonstrated large interindividual differences in the change patterns of individual difference factors examined. Changes in perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, computer interest, computer self-efficacy, and computer anxiety were Discussion and Implications: Our findings demonstrate the limitation of popular constructs in technology acceptance literature in predicting continued use and point out important gaps in knowledge to be targeted in future investigations.

Indexed as

AdherenceDigital divideInformation system continuanceUnified theory of acceptance and use of technology (UTAUT)

Identifiers

PMID37197443
PMCPMC10184684
OpenAlexW4360610595

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.