Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37197430›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in oncology2023

RIPK1 and RIPK3 are positive prognosticators for cervical cancer patients and C2 ceramide can inhibit tumor cell proliferation

Tilman L R Vogelsang, Verena Kast, Konstantin Bagnjuk, Katja Eubler, Sree Priyanka Jeevanandan, Elisa Schmoeckel, Anna Trebo, Nicole Elisabeth Topalov, Sven Mahner, Doris Mayr and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Sphingolipid metabolism and regulated cell death in malignant melanoma.Apoptosis : an international journal on programmed cell death · 2024
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Tilman L R VogelsangDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital, Ludwig-Maximilians-University (LMU) Munich, Munich, Germany.
Verena KastBiomedical Center Munich (BMC), Cell Biology, Anatomy III, Ludwig-Maximilians-University (LMU) Munich, Planegg, Germany.
Konstantin BagnjukBiomedical Center Munich (BMC), Cell Biology, Anatomy III, Ludwig-Maximilians-University (LMU) Munich, Planegg, Germany.
Katja EublerBiomedical Center Munich (BMC), Cell Biology, Anatomy III, Ludwig-Maximilians-University (LMU) Munich, Planegg, Germany.
Sree Priyanka JeevanandanBiomedical Center Munich (BMC), Cell Biology, Anatomy III, Ludwig-Maximilians-University (LMU) Munich, Planegg, Germany.
Elisa SchmoeckelFaculty of Medicine, Institute of Pathology, Ludwig-Maximilians-University (LMU) Munich, Munich, Germany.
Anna TreboDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital, Ludwig-Maximilians-University (LMU) Munich, Munich, Germany.
Nicole Elisabeth TopalovDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital, Ludwig-Maximilians-University (LMU) Munich, Munich, Germany.
Sven MahnerDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital, Ludwig-Maximilians-University (LMU) Munich, Munich, Germany.
Doris MayrFaculty of Medicine, Institute of Pathology, Ludwig-Maximilians-University (LMU) Munich, Munich, Germany.
Artur MayerhoferBiomedical Center Munich (BMC), Cell Biology, Anatomy III, Ludwig-Maximilians-University (LMU) Munich, Planegg, Germany.
Udo JeschkeDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital, Ludwig-Maximilians-University (LMU) Munich, Munich, Germany.
Aurelia VattaiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital, Ludwig-Maximilians-University (LMU) Munich, Munich, Germany.
Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München · DEUniversity Hospital Augsburg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: The enzymes Receptor-interacting serine/threonine-protein kinase 1 (RIPK1) und 3 (RIPK3) as well as the protein Mixed lineage kinase domain like pseudokinase (pMLKL) play a role in the signaling cascade of necroptosis. This is a form of programmed cell death which is caspase-independent. High-risk human papilloma virus infection can inhibit necroptosis. Thereby, a persistent infection and consequently the development of cervical cancer can be triggered. Aim of this study was the analysis of the expression of RIPK1, RIPK3 and pMLKL in cervical cancer tissue and the evaluation of its prognostic value on overall survival, progression-free survival and additional clinical parameters. Methods: The expression of RIPK1, RIPK3, and pMLKL in cervical cancer tissue microarrays of n = 250 patients was analyzed immunohistochemically. Further, the effect of C2 ceramide on several cervical cancer cell lines (CaSki, HeLa, SiHa) was examined. C2 ceramide is a biologically active short-chain ceramide that induces necroptosis in human luteal granulosa cells. Results: Significantly longer overall survival and progression-free survival rates could be detected in cervical cancer patients expressing nuclear RIPK1 or RIPK3 alone or simultaneously (RIPK1 and RIPK3). Cell viability and proliferation was reduced through C2 ceramide stimulation of cervical cancer cells. Simultaneous stimulation of C2 ceramide and the pan-caspase inhibitor Z-VAD-fmk, or the RIPK1-inhibitor necrostatin-1, partly reversed the negative effect of C2 ceramide on cell viability. This observation could imply that caspase-dependent and -independent forms of cell death, including necroptosis, can occur. AnnexinV-FITC apoptosis staining induced a significant increase in apoptotic cells in CaSki and SiHa cells. The stimulation of CaSki cells with C2 ceramide led to a significant percentual increase in necrotic/intermediate (dying) cells after stimulation with C2 ceramide. In addition, after stimulation with C2 ceramide, CaSki and HeLa cells live cell imaging showed morphological changes which are common for necroptosis. Discussion: In conclusion, RIPK1 and RIPK3 are independent positive predictors for overall survival and progression-free survival in cervical cancer patients. C2 ceramide can reduce cell viability and proliferation in cervical cancer cells by inducing most likely both apoptosis and necroptosis.

Indexed as

C2 ceramidecervical cancerhuman papillomavirusnecroptosispMLKLprogrammed cell deathRIPK1RIPK3

Identifiers

PMID37197430
PMCPMC10183606
OpenAlexW4367626276

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.