Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37197374›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.)2023

Automatic segmentation and quantification of the optic nerve on MRI using a 3D U-Net.

Sabien van Elst, Christiaan M de Bloeme, Samantha Noteboom, Marcus C de Jong, Annette C Moll, Sophia Göricke, Pim de Graaf, Matthan W A Caan

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Sabien van ElstAmsterdam UMC location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2784-1988
Christiaan M de BloemeAmsterdam UMC location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Samantha NoteboomAmsterdam UMC location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Department of Anatomy and Neurosciences, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Marcus C de JongAmsterdam UMC location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8524-5108
Annette C MollCancer Center Amsterdam, Imaging and Biomarkers, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Sophia GörickeUniversity Hospital Essen, Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Neuroradiology, Essen, Germany.
Pim de GraafAmsterdam UMC location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Matthan W A CaanAmsterdam UMC location University of Amsterdam, Department of Biomedical Engineering and Physics, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5162-8880
Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam · NLCancer Center Amsterdam · NLEssen University Hospital · DEUniversity of Amsterdam · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: Pathological conditions associated with the optic nerve (ON) can cause structural changes in the nerve. Quantifying these changes could provide further understanding of disease mechanisms. We aim to develop a framework that automatically segments the ON separately from its surrounding cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and quantifies the diameter and cross-sectional area along the entire length of the nerve. Approach: Multicenter data were obtained from retinoblastoma referral centers, providing a heterogeneous dataset of 40 high-resolution 3D T2-weighted MRI scans with manual ground truth delineations of both ONs. A 3D U-Net was used for ON segmentation, and performance was assessed in a tenfold cross-validation ( Results: The segmentation network achieved high performance, with a mean Dice similarity coefficient score of 0.84, median Hausdorff distance of 0.64 mm, and ICC of 0.95 on the test-set. The quantification method obtained acceptable correspondence to manual reference measurements with mean ICC values of 0.76 for the diameter and 0.71 for the cross-sectional area. Compared with other methods, our method precisely identifies the ON from surrounding CSF and accurately estimates its diameter along the nerve's centerline. Conclusions: Our automated framework provides an objective method for ON assessment

Indexed as

magnetic resonance imagingoptic nervequantificationsegmentationU-Net

Identifiers

PMID37197374
PMCPMC10185127
OpenAlexW4376603239

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.