Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37197345›Full record

ArticleRevista brasileira de medicina do trabalho : publicacao oficial da Associacao Nacional de Medicina do Trabalho-ANAMT

Sanitary and environmental conditions related to food poisoning among informal street vendors in downtown Medellín, Colombia, 2016.

María Osley Garzón Duque, Fabio León Rodríguez Ospina, Luisa María Saldarriaga Callejas, Juan José Amaya Alviar, Doris Cardona Arango, Maríana Ochoa Sanchez, Ángela María Segura Cardona, María Camila Tamayo Mejía, Iordana Mejía Kambourova

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Revista brasileira de medicina do trabalho : publicacao oficial da Associacao Nacional de Medicina do Trabalho-ANAMT. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

María Osley Garzón DuqueFacultad de Medicina, Universidad CES, Medellín, Antioquia, Colombia.ORCID 0000-0001-7261-3146
Fabio León Rodríguez OspinaFacultad Nacional de Salud Pública, Universidad de Antioquia, Medellín, Antioquia, Colombia.
Luisa María Saldarriaga CallejasFacultad de Medicina, Universidad CES, Medellín, Antioquia, Colombia.
Juan José Amaya AlviarFacultad de Medicina, Universidad CES, Medellín, Antioquia, Colombia.
Doris Cardona ArangoEscuela de Graduados, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad CES, Medellín, Antioquia, Colombia.
Maríana Ochoa SanchezFacultad de Medicina, Universidad CES, Medellín, Antioquia, Colombia.
Ángela María Segura CardonaEscuela de Graduados, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad CES, Medellín, Antioquia, Colombia.
María Camila Tamayo MejíaFacultad de Medicina, Universidad CES, Medellín, Antioquia, Colombia.
Iordana Mejía KambourovaFacultad de Medicina, Universidad CES, Medellín, Antioquia, Colombia.
Federación Colombiana de Obstetricia y Ginecología · COUniversidad de Antioquia · CO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Although studies with informal workers have been conducted in Latin America and the Caribbean, there is still scarce evidence on the prevalence of food poisoning among workers with subsistence jobs on the streets and sidewalks of cities and on the factors that influence its presentation. Objectives: To determine sociodemographic, labor, sanitary, and environmental conditions that influence the prevalence of food poisoning in informal workers in downtown Medellín, Colombia. Methods: This is a cross-sectional study using a workers' survey as the primary source. A total of 686 workers aged ≥18 years who had been working for ≥ 5 years were surveyed. An assisted survey was initially applied as a pilot test for training purposes and to obtain informed consent. Results: We identified several associations and explanatory factors of food poisoning using chi-square tests and prevalence ratios, with unadjusted and adjusted 95% confidence intervals (95%CI). A higher prevalence of food poisoning (p < 0.05) was observed in workers with lower frequency of waste collection (PR = 2.09; 95%CI = 1.04-4.19), who left cooked food (PR = 6.40; 95%CI = 2.34-17.8), beverages or chopped fruits uncovered at their workplace (PR = 3.92; 95%CI = 1.40-10.48), with inadequate waste management (PR = 4.84; 95%CI = 2.12-11.06), exposure to polluted water (PR = 3.00; 95%CI = 1.20-7.50) and acceptable water supply (PR = 5.40; 95%CI = 1.60-17.8). The factors that explained higher rates of food poisoning were not having a waste collection service (PR Conclusions: The conditions that are associated with and explain the higher prevalence of food poisoning in this working population can be addressed with health promotion and disease prevention interventions.

Indexed as

abastecimiento de alimentosambiente de trabajofood supplyinformal workersoccupational risksperfiles sanitariosriesgos laboralessanitary profilestrabajadores informalesworking environment

Identifiers

PMID37197345
PMCPMC10185398
OpenAlexW4365420888

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.