ArticleRevista brasileira de medicina do trabalho : publicacao oficial da Associacao Nacional de Medicina do Trabalho-ANAMT
Rural work in the sugarcane sector and its influences on health: scoping review.
Article in Revista brasileira de medicina do trabalho : publicacao oficial da Associacao Nacional de Medicina do Trabalho-ANAMT. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Where we work correlates with whether we receive cardiorespiratory preventive care services: Health and Retirement Study 2003-2018.BMC public health · 2025Article
- Work and work exposures in sugarcane farming in Eswatini, Southern Africa.International archives of occupational and environmental health · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Since the 2000s, a growing number of studies have been conducted that evaluate rural working conditions in sugarcane plantations. However, there is a need to organize their findings and compile the measures they suggest to protect workers' health. The objective of this review was to map scientific publications on rural work at sugarcane plantations and its influence on the health of the industry's workers. The methodological approach adopted was a scoping review, performed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews checklist. Literature searches were conducted in December 2019 using the Cochrane, Web of Science, PubMed, Scopus, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), and Biblioteca Virtual em Saúde databases. The inclusion criteria were original or review studies that answer the research question, with full text available in English, Portuguese, or Spanish, using qualitative or quantitative approaches. Articles were excluded if they did not answer the primary question, if they were duplicates, opinion pieces, theoretical reflections, books, guidelines, theses, or dissertations. A total of 193 studies were identified, 12 of which met the eligibility criteria. These studies showed that sugarcane workers are exposed to thermal, chemical, biological, physiological, mechanical, and emotional risks. The main health problems observed were respiratory, circulatory, renal, and musculoskeletal problems, genotoxic agents, and work-related accidents. It was therefore possible to conclude that the sugarcane work environment can impact workers' health and disease processes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.