Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37197159›Full record

ReviewVideoGIE : an official video journal of the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy2023

Use of the endoscopic powered resection device for the management of scarred polyps.

Natalie Wilson, Vijay S Are, Roberto Osorio Cintron, Nabeel Azeem, Mohammad Bilal

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in VideoGIE : an official video journal of the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Endoscopic mucosal resection: tips and tricks for gastrointestinal trainees.Translational gastroenterology and hepatology · 2023
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Natalie WilsonDepartment of Internal Medicine, University of Minnesota Medical Center, Minneapolis, Minnesota.
Vijay S AreDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Minnesota Medical Center, Minneapolis, Minnesota.
Roberto Osorio CintronMinneapolis Veterans Affairs Health Care System, Minneapolis, Minnesota.
Nabeel AzeemDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Minnesota Medical Center, Minneapolis, Minnesota.
Mohammad BilalDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Minnesota Medical Center, Minneapolis, Minnesota.
University of Minnesota Medical Center · USMinneapolis VA Health Care System · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and Aims: The endoscopic powered resection (EPR) device (EndoRotor, Interscope Inc, Northbridge, Mass, USA) is a novel nonthermal device that can be used for polyp and tissue removal in the GI tract. Here, we review the EPR device and illustrate its use for resection of scarred or fibrotic lesions in the GI tract. Methods: In this article and accompanying video, we describe the EPR device features, provide step-by-step instructions for device setup, and review case examples in which the EPR device was used for scarred polyp resection. We also review the current literature describing the use of the EPR device for scarred or challenging polyps. Results: Four lesions with scarring or fibrosis were successfully resected with the EPR device, either with the EPR device alone or as an adjunct to conventional resection methods. No adverse events occurred. A follow-up endoscopy was available in 1 case, which demonstrated no endoscopic or histologic evidence of residual or recurrent lesion. Conclusions: The endoscopic powered resection device can be used alone or as an adjunct to facilitate resection of lesions with significant fibrosis or scarring. This device serves as a useful addition to endoscopists' toolbox in the management of scarred lesions where other modalities might be technically challenging to use.

Identifiers

PMID37197159
PMCPMC10183672
OpenAlexW4365511079

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.