Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37196709›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of transplantation : official journal of the American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons2023

Increased volume of organ offers and decreased efficiency of kidney placement under circle-based kidney allocation.

David C Cron, Syed A Husain, Kristen L King, Sumit Mohan, Joel T Adler

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of transplantation : official journal of the American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed
12.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 51 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Kidney medicine · 2026
    Article
  8. Outcomes of Deceased Donor Kidney Transplants Allocated Out of Sequence in the United States.Clinical journal of the American Society of Nephrology : CJASN · 2026
    Observational
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Out-of-Sequence Placement of Deceased Donor Kidneys Is Exacerbating Inequities in the United States.Clinical journal of the American Society of Nephrology : CJASN · 2026
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Decreasing efficiency in deceased donor kidney offer notifications under the new distance-based kidney allocation system.American journal of transplantation : official journal of the American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons · 2025
    Article
  18. Underrecognition of deceased donor kidney out-of-sequence allocation due to increasing use of free-text coding.American journal of transplantation : official journal of the American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons · 2025
    Article
  19. Association between out-of-sequence allocation and deceased donor kidney nonuse across organ procurement organizations.American journal of transplantation : official journal of the American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons · 2025
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

David C CronDepartment of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA; Center for Surgery and Public Health, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Syed A HusainDivision of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Vagelos College of Physicians & Surgeons, Columbia University, New York, New York, USA; The Columbia University Renal Epidemiology (CURE) Group, New York, New York, USA.
Kristen L KingDivision of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Vagelos College of Physicians & Surgeons, Columbia University, New York, New York, USA; The Columbia University Renal Epidemiology (CURE) Group, New York, New York, USA.
Sumit MohanDivision of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Vagelos College of Physicians & Surgeons, Columbia University, New York, New York, USA; The Columbia University Renal Epidemiology (CURE) Group, New York, New York, USA; Department of Epidemiology, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, New York, USA.
Joel T AdlerDivision of Transplantation, Department of Surgery and Perioperative Care, Dell Medical School at The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas, USA. Electronic address: joel.adler@austin.utexas.edu.
Columbia University · USBrigham and Women's Hospital · USThe University of Texas at Austin · US

Funding

Evaluating the role of telehealth in patients with end stage kidney disease (ESKD)K08HS028476 · AHRQ · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN · PI Joel Thomas Adler · 2022 to 2026
$721k
Using Decision Making Science to Optimize Deceased Donor Kidney AllocationK23DK133729 · NIDDK · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI HUSAIN, SYED ALI · 2022 to 2025
$678k
A mixed-methods approach to identify factors determining utilization of marginal quality deceased donor livers for transplantationF32DK128981 · NIDDK · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI CRON, DAVID COULTON · 2021 to 2022
$146k
AHRQ HHS K08 HS028476NIDDK NIH HHS F32 DK128981NIDDK NIH HHS K23 DK133729NIDDK NIH HHS L60 DK130619
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The newest kidney allocation policy kidney allocation system 250 (KAS250) broadened geographic distribution while increasing allocation system complexity. We studied the volume of kidney offers received by transplant centers and the efficiency of kidney placement since KAS250. We identified deceased-donor kidney offers (N = 907,848; N = 36,226 donors) to 185 US transplant centers from January 1, 2019, to December 31, 2021 (policy implemented March 15, 2021). Each unique donor offered to a center was considered a single offer. We compared the monthly volume of offers received by centers and the number of centers offered before the first acceptance using an interrupted time series approach (pre-/post-KAS250). Post-KAS250, transplant centers received more kidney offers (level change: 32.5 offers/center/mo, P < .001; slope change: 3.9 offers/center/mo, P = .003). The median monthly offer volume post-/pre-KAS250 was 195 (interquartile range 137-253) vs. 115 (76-151). There was no significant increase in deceased-donor transplant volume at the center level after KAS250, and center-specific changes in offer volume did not correlate with changes in transplant volume (r = -0.001). Post-KAS250, the number of centers to whom a kidney was offered before acceptance increased significantly (level change: 1.7 centers/donor, P < .001; slope change: 0.1 centers/donor/mo, P = .014). These findings demonstrate the logistical burden of broader organ sharing, and future allocation policy changes will need to balance equity in transplant access with the operational efficiency of the allocation system.

Indexed as

Kidney TransplantationTissue and Organ ProcurementTransplantsHumansKidneyTissue DonorsWaiting Listsallocation policybroader distribution organ offerconcentric circlekidney allocation systemkidney offerkidney transplanttransplant center

Identifiers

PMID37196709
PMCPMC10527286
OpenAlexW4376648934

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.