Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37196395›Full record

ArticleSocial science & medicine (1982)2023

The diffusion of health care fraud: A bipartite network analysis.

A James O'Malley, Thomas A Bubolz, Jonathan S Skinner

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Social science & medicine (1982), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

A James O'MalleyDepartment of Biomedical Data Science, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, 1 Medical Center Drive, Lebanon, NH 03755, USA; The Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, 1 Medical Center Drive, Lebanon, NH 03755, USA. Electronic address: james.omalley@dartmouth.edu.
Thomas A BubolzThe Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, 1 Medical Center Drive, Lebanon, NH 03755, USA. Electronic address: tom.bubolz@gmail.com.
Jonathan S SkinnerThe Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, 1 Medical Center Drive, Lebanon, NH 03755, USA; Department of Economics, Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH 03755, USA; National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA. Electronic address: jonathan.skinner@dartmouth.edu.

Funding

UNDERSTANDING AND IMPROVING EPISODE-BASED HOSPITAL CAREP01AG019783 · NIA · DARTMOUTH COLLEGE · PI Leila S. Agha · 2001 to 2026
$52.9M
Technology Diffusion, Health Outcomes, and Healthcare ExpendituresU01AG046830 · NIA · DARTMOUTH COLLEGE · PI SKINNER, JONATHAN S · 2013 to 2017
$4.5M
NIA NIH HHS P01 AG019783NIA NIH HHS U01 AG046830
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Many studies have examined the diffusion of health care innovation but less is known about the diffusion of health care fraud. In this paper, we consider the diffusion of potentially fraudulent Medicare home health care billing in the United States during 2002-16, with a focus on the 21 hospital referral regions (HRRs) covered by local Department of Justice (DOJ) anti-fraud "strike force" offices. We hypothesize that patient-sharing across home health care agencies (HHAs) provides a mechanism for the rapid diffusion of fraudulent strategies. We measure such activity using a novel bipartite mixture (or BMIX) network index, which captures patient sharing across multiple agencies and thus conveys more information about the diffusion process than conventional unipartite network measures. Using a complete population of fee-for-service Medicare claims data, we first find a remarkable increase in home health care activity between 2002 and 2009 in many regions targeted by the DOJ; average billing per Medicare enrollee in McAllen TX and Miami increased by $2127 and $2422 compared to just an average $289 increase in other HRRs not targeted by the DOJ. Second, we establish that the HRR-level BMIX (but not other network measures) was a strong predictor of above-average home health care expenditures across HRRs. Third, within HRRs, agencies sharing more patients with other agencies were predicted to increase billing. Finally, the initial 2002 BMIX index was a strong predictor of subsequent changes in HRR-level home health billing during 2002-9. These results highlight the importance of bipartite network structure in diffusion and in infection and contagion models more generally.

Indexed as

Delivery of Health CareMedicareAgedFee-for-Service PlansFraudHumansReferral and ConsultationUnited StatesBeneficiary-sharingBipartite degreeBipartite mixture network indexDiffusionHealth care fraudHome health carePeer-effectSocial network

Identifiers

PMID37196395
PMCPMC10290506

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.