Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37196033›Full record

ArticlePLoS pathogens2023

Spike substitution T813S increases Sarbecovirus fusogenicity by enhancing the usage of TMPRSS2.

Yong Ma, Pengbin Li, Yunqi Hu, Tianyi Qiu, Lixiang Wang, Hongjie Lu, Kexin Lv, Mengxin Xu, Jiaxin Zhuang, Xue Liu and 20 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS pathogens, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

30 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Yong MaSchool of Public Health (Shenzhen), Shenzhen Campus of Sun Yat-sen University, Shenzhen, China.
Pengbin LiSchool of Public Health (Shenzhen), Shenzhen Campus of Sun Yat-sen University, Shenzhen, China.
Yunqi HuSchool of Public Health (Shenzhen), Shenzhen Campus of Sun Yat-sen University, Shenzhen, China.
Tianyi QiuInstitute of Clinical Science, Zhongshan Hospital, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Lixiang WangDepartment of Immunology and Microbiology, Zhongshan School of Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Hongjie LuSchool of Public Health (Shenzhen), Shenzhen Campus of Sun Yat-sen University, Shenzhen, China.
Kexin LvSchool of Public Health (Shenzhen), Shenzhen Campus of Sun Yat-sen University, Shenzhen, China.
Mengxin XuSchool of Public Health (Shenzhen), Shenzhen Campus of Sun Yat-sen University, Shenzhen, China.
Jiaxin ZhuangThe Center for Infection and Immunity Study and Molecular Cancer Research Center, School of Medicine, Shenzhen Campus of Sun Yat-sen University, Shenzhen, China.
Xue LiuThe Center for Infection and Immunity Study and Molecular Cancer Research Center, School of Medicine, Shenzhen Campus of Sun Yat-sen University, Shenzhen, China.
Suhua HeMolecular Imaging Center, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Biomedical Imaging, the Fifth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Zhuhai, China.
Bing HeSchool of Public Health (Shenzhen), Shenzhen Campus of Sun Yat-sen University, Shenzhen, China.
Shuning LiuSchool of Public Health (Shenzhen), Shenzhen Campus of Sun Yat-sen University, Shenzhen, China.
Lin LiuSchool of Public Health (Shenzhen), Shenzhen Campus of Sun Yat-sen University, Shenzhen, China.
Yuanyuan WangSchool of Public Health (Shenzhen), Shenzhen Campus of Sun Yat-sen University, Shenzhen, China.
Xinyu YueSchool of Public Health (Shenzhen), Shenzhen Campus of Sun Yat-sen University, Shenzhen, China.
Yanmei ZhaiSchool of Public Health (Shenzhen), Shenzhen Campus of Sun Yat-sen University, Shenzhen, China.
Wanyu LuoSchool of Public Health (Shenzhen), Shenzhen Campus of Sun Yat-sen University, Shenzhen, China.
Haoting MaiSchool of Public Health (Shenzhen), Shenzhen Campus of Sun Yat-sen University, Shenzhen, China.
Yu KuangSchool of Public Health (Shenzhen), Shenzhen Campus of Sun Yat-sen University, Shenzhen, China.
Shifeng ChenThe 74(th) Group Army Hospital, Guangzhou, China.
Feng YeThe 74(th) Group Army Hospital, Guangzhou, China.
Na ZhouThe 74(th) Group Army Hospital, Guangzhou, China.
Wenjing ZhaoThe Center for Infection and Immunity Study and Molecular Cancer Research Center, School of Medicine, Shenzhen Campus of Sun Yat-sen University, Shenzhen, China.
Jun ChenDepartment of Immunology and Microbiology, Zhongshan School of Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Shoudeng ChenMolecular Imaging Center, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Biomedical Imaging, the Fifth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Zhuhai, China.
Xiaoli XiongState Key Laboratory of Respiratory Disease, CAS Key Laboratory of Regenerative Biology, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Stem Cell and Regenerative Medicine, Guangzhou Institutes of Biomedicine and Health, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Guangzhou, China.
Mang ShiThe Center for Infection and Immunity Study and Molecular Cancer Research Center, School of Medicine, Shenzhen Campus of Sun Yat-sen University, Shenzhen, China.
Ji-An PanThe Center for Infection and Immunity Study and Molecular Cancer Research Center, School of Medicine, Shenzhen Campus of Sun Yat-sen University, Shenzhen, China.
Yao-Qing ChenSchool of Public Health (Shenzhen), Shenzhen Campus of Sun Yat-sen University, Shenzhen, China.ORCID 0000-0002-4659-1550
Sun Yat-sen University · CNChinese Academy of Sciences · CNShanghai Medical College of Fudan University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

SARS-CoV Spike (S) protein shares considerable homology with SARS-CoV-2 S, especially in the conserved S2 subunit (S2). S protein mediates coronavirus receptor binding and membrane fusion, and the latter activity can greatly influence coronavirus infection. We observed that SARS-CoV S is less effective in inducing membrane fusion compared with SARS-CoV-2 S. We identify that S813T mutation is sufficient in S2 interfering with the cleavage of SARS-CoV-2 S by TMPRSS2, reducing spike fusogenicity and pseudoparticle entry. Conversely, the mutation of T813S in SARS-CoV S increased fusion ability and viral replication. Our data suggested that residue 813 in the S was critical for the proteolytic activation, and the change from threonine to serine at 813 position might be an evolutionary feature adopted by SARS-2-related viruses. This finding deepened the understanding of Spike fusogenicity and could provide a new perspective for exploring Sarbecovirus' evolution.

Indexed as

COVID-19Severe acute respiratory syndrome-related coronavirusHumansProteolysisSARS-CoV-2Serine EndopeptidasesSpike Glycoprotein, CoronavirusVirus InternalizationVirus ReplicationSerine EndopeptidasesSpike Glycoprotein, Coronavirusspike protein, SARS-CoV-2TMPRSS2 protein, human

Identifiers

PMID37196033
PMCPMC10228797
OpenAlexW4376959018

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.