Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37195964›Full record

ArticlePLoS pathogens2023

Intervention reducing malaria parasite load in vector mosquitoes: No impact on Plasmodium falciparum extrinsic incubation period and the survival of Anopheles gambiae.

Edwige Guissou, Dari Frédéric Da, Domombabele François de Sales Hien, Koudraogo Bienvenue Yameogo, Serge Rakiswende Yerbanga, Georges Anicet Ouédraogo, Kounbobr Roch Dabiré, Thierry Lefèvre, Anna Cohuet

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS pathogens, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
5.5field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Evaluation of the transmission-blocking potential ofFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Edwige GuissouInstitut de Recherche en Sciences de la Santé, Bobo-Dioulasso, Burkina Faso.ORCID 0000-0001-9285-027X
Dari Frédéric DaInstitut de Recherche en Sciences de la Santé, Bobo-Dioulasso, Burkina Faso.
Domombabele François de Sales HienInstitut de Recherche en Sciences de la Santé, Bobo-Dioulasso, Burkina Faso.
Koudraogo Bienvenue YameogoInstitut de Recherche en Sciences de la Santé, Bobo-Dioulasso, Burkina Faso.
Serge Rakiswende YerbangaInstitut de Recherche en Sciences de la Santé, Bobo-Dioulasso, Burkina Faso.
Georges Anicet OuédraogoUniversité Nazi Boni, Bobo-Dioulasso, Burkina Faso.
Kounbobr Roch DabiréInstitut de Recherche en Sciences de la Santé, Bobo-Dioulasso, Burkina Faso.
Thierry LefèvreInstitut de Recherche en Sciences de la Santé, Bobo-Dioulasso, Burkina Faso.
Anna CohuetMIVEGEC, Montpellier University, IRD, CNRS, Montpellier, France.
Institut de Recherche en Sciences de la Santé · BFCentre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRNazi Boni University · BF

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the fight against malaria, transmission blocking interventions (TBIs) such as transmission blocking vaccines or drugs, are promising approaches to complement conventional tools. They aim to prevent the infection of vectors and thereby reduce the subsequent exposure of a human population to infectious mosquitoes. The effectiveness of these approaches has been shown to depend on the initial intensity of infection in mosquitoes, often measured as the mean number of oocysts resulting from an infectious blood meal in absence of intervention. In mosquitoes exposed to a high intensity of infection, current TBI candidates are expected to be ineffective at completely blocking infection but will decrease parasite load and therefore, potentially also affect key parameters of vector transmission. The present study investigated the consequences of changes in oocyst intensity on subsequent parasite development and mosquito survival. To address this, we experimentally produced different intensities of infection for Anopheles gambiae females from Burkina Faso by diluting gametocytes from three natural Plasmodium falciparum local isolates and used a newly developed non-destructive method based on the exploitation of mosquito sugar feeding to track parasite and mosquito life history traits throughout sporogonic development. Our results indicate the extrinsic incubation period (EIP) of P. falciparum and mosquito survival did not vary with parasite density but differed significantly between parasite isolates with estimated EIP50 of 16 (95% CI: 15-18), 14 (95% CI: 12-16) and 12 (95% CI: 12-13) days and median longevity of 25 (95% CI: 22-29), 15 (95% CI: 13-15) and 18 (95% CI: 17-19) days for the three isolates respectively. Our results here do not identify unintended consequences of the decrease of parasite loads in mosquitoes on the parasite incubation period or on mosquito survival, two key parameters of vectorial capacity, and hence support the use of transmission blocking strategies to control malaria.

Indexed as

AnophelesMalariaMalaria, FalciparumAnimalsFemaleHumansInfectious Disease Incubation PeriodMosquito VectorsOocystsParasite LoadPlasmodium falciparum

Identifiers

PMID37195964
PMCPMC10191285
OpenAlexW4377011090

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.