Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37195911›Full record

ArticlePloS one2023

Evaluation of 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25(OH)D) levels before and during the COVID-19 pandemic: A cross-sectional study and trend analysis involving 86,772 samples.

Mehmet Emin Arayıcı, Sila Ovgu Korkut-Uysal, Asim Leblebici, Zeynep Akcali, Deniz Tuna Edizer, Seher Kabul, Dilek Cimrin, Ender Berat Ellidokuz

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Mehmet Emin ArayıcıDepartment of Preventive Oncology, Institute of Health Sciences, Dokuz Eylul University, Izmir, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0002-0492-5129
Sila Ovgu Korkut-UysalFaculty of Engineering and Architecture, Department of Engineering Sciences, Izmir Katip Celebi University, Izmir, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0003-4784-2013
Asim LeblebiciDepartment of Translational Oncology, Institute of Health Sciences, Dokuz Eylul University, Izmir, Turkey.
Zeynep AkcaliDepartment of Translational Oncology, Institute of Health Sciences, Dokuz Eylul University, Izmir, Turkey.
Deniz Tuna EdizerDepartment of Translational Oncology, Institute of Health Sciences, Dokuz Eylul University, Izmir, Turkey.
Seher KabulFaculty of Medicine, Department of Biochemistry, Dokuz Eylul University, Izmir, Turkey.
Dilek CimrinDepartment of Medical Services and Techniques, Medical Laboratory Techniques Program, Vocational School of Health Services, Dokuz Eylul University, Izmir, Turkey.
Ender Berat EllidokuzFaculty of Medicine, Department of Gastroenterology, Division of Internal Medicine, Dokuz Eylul University, Izmir, Turkey.
Dokuz Eylül University · TRIzmir Kâtip Çelebi University · TR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe aim of this paper was to evaluate the change in 25-hidroxyvitamin D (25(OH)D) levels before and during the COVID-19 pandemic.

methodsIn this retrospective, cross-sectional and methodological study included 86,772 patients (18-75 years) samples who were admitted to the Izmir Dokuz Eylul University Hospital (latitude and longitude (Turkey): 27 E 09; 38 N 25, respectively) for various reasons and whose 25(OH)D levels were measured in the biochemistry unit between 2019-2020 and 2020-2021 (before and during the COVID-19 outbreak). A time series analysis of monthly averages for 25(OH)D was performed. For the purpose of seasonal study, the mean levels of 25(OH)D are grouped by years. Data were modeled in terms of 25(OH)D levels using the MATLAB Curve Fitting Toolbox.

resultsThere was no significant difference between the sexes according to 25(OH)D levels (p>0.05). 25(OH)D levels were significantly higher in the summer months and lower in the winter months (p<0.001). When comparing the spring months, 25(OH)D levels in 2020 (18 ± 10) were found to be significantly lower than in 2019 (22 ± 12) (p<0.001); on the contrary, when examined based on the summer, autumn, and winter months, it was determined that 25(OH)D levels increased in 2020 (summer: 25 ± 13, autumn: 25 ± 14, and winter: 19 ± 10) compared to 2019 (summer: 23 ± 11, autumn: 22 ± 10, and winter: 19 ± 11) (p<0.001). In the estimates curve obtained with an error margin of 11% in the time series analysis, it was estimated that the 25(OH)D averages after the pandemic would be similar to those before the pandemic.

conclusionsRestrictions, partial or complete closures, and curfews can significantly affect individuals' 25(OH)D levels during the COVID-19 outbreak. There is a need for multicenter studies with larger populations covering different regions to strengthen and support our results.

Indexed as

COVID-19Vitamin D DeficiencyCalcifediolCross-Sectional StudiesHumansPandemicsRetrospective StudiesSeasonsVitamin D25-hydroxyvitamin DCalcifediolVitamin D

Identifiers

PMID37195911
PMCPMC10191318
OpenAlexW4377010713

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.