Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37195762›Full record

ArticleJMIR aging2023

COVID-19 Infodemic and Impacts on the Mental Health of Older People: Cross-sectional Multicenter Survey Study.

Patricia Rodrigues Braz, Tiago Ricardo Moreira, Andréia Queiroz Ribeiro, Luciane Ribeiro de Faria, Fabio da Costa Carbogim, Vilanice Alves de Araújo Püschel, Jack Roberto Silva Fhon, Eduarda Rezende Freitas, Ione Carvalho Pinto, Fabiana Costa Machado Zacharias and 7 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR aging, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 10 institutions in 1 country.

Patricia Rodrigues BrazUniversidade Federal de Juiz de Fora, Juiz de Fora, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2102-635X
Tiago Ricardo MoreiraUniversidade Federal de Viçosa, Viçosa, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6606-4942
Andréia Queiroz RibeiroUniversidade Federal de Viçosa, Viçosa, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6546-1252
Luciane Ribeiro de FariaUniversidade Federal de Juiz de Fora, Juiz de Fora - MG, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7856-5659
Fabio da Costa CarbogimUniversidade Federal de Juiz de Fora, Juiz de Fora, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2065-5998
Vilanice Alves de Araújo PüschelUniversidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6375-3876
Jack Roberto Silva FhonUniversidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1880-4379
Eduarda Rezende FreitasUniversidade Católica de Brasília, Brasília, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0315-9549
Ione Carvalho PintoUniversidade de São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7541-5591
Fabiana Costa Machado ZachariasUniversidade de São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1150-6114
Gylce Eloisa Cabreira Panitz CruzUniversidade Federal de São João Del Rei, Divinópolis, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6490-3319
Richardson Miranda MachadoUniversidade Federal de São João Del Rei, Divinópolis, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9895-6905
Rosimere Ferreira SantanaUniversidade Federal Fluminense, Niterói, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4593-3715
Priscilla Alfradique de SouzaUniversidade Federal do Estado do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4625-7552
Graziele Ribeiro Bitencourt *Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Macaé, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9130-9307
Alexandre Favero BulgarelliUniversidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7110-251X
Ricardo Bezerra CavalcanteUniversidade Federal de Juiz de Fora, Juiz de Fora - MG, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5381-4815
Universidade Federal de Juiz de Fora · BRFederal University of São João del-Rei · BRUniversidade de Ribeirão Preto · BRUniversidade de São Paulo · BRUniversidade Católica de Brasília · BRUniversidade Federal de Viçosa · BRUniversidade Federal do Estado do Rio de Janeiro · BRUniversidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro · BRUniversidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul · BRUniversidade Federal Fluminense · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe COVID-19 pandemic received widespread media coverage due to its novelty, an early lack of data, and the rapid rise in deaths and cases. This excessive coverage created a secondary "infodemic" that was considered to be a serious public and mental health problem by the World Health Organization and the international scientific community. The infodemic particularly affected older individuals, specifically those who are vulnerable to misinformation due to political positions, low interpretive and critical analysis capacity, and limited technical-scientific knowledge. Thus, it is important to understand older people's reaction to COVID-19 information disseminated by the media and the effect on their lives and mental health.

objectiveWe aimed to describe the profile of exposure to COVID-19 information among older Brazilian individuals and the impact on their mental health, perceived stress, and the presence of generalized anxiety disorder (GAD).

methodsThis cross-sectional, exploratory study surveyed 3307 older Brazilians via the web, social networks, and email between July 2020 and March 2021. Descriptive analysis and bivariate analysis were performed to estimate associations of interest.

resultsMajor proportions of the 3307 participants were aged 60 to 64 years (n=1285, 38.9%), female (n=2250, 68.4%), and married (n=1835, 55.5%) and self-identified as White (n=2364, 71.5%). Only 295 (8.9%) had never started or completed a basic education. COVID-19 information was mainly accessed on television (n=2680, 81.1%) and social networks (n=1943, 58.8%). Television exposure was ≥3 hours in 1301 (39.3%) participants, social network use was 2 to 5 hours in 1084 (32.8%) participants, and radio exposure was ≥1 hour in 1223 (37%) participants. Frequency of exposure to social networks was significantly associated with perceived stress (P=.04) and GAD (P=.01). A Bonferroni post hoc test revealed significantly different perceived stress in participants who were exposed to social networks for 1 hour (P=.04) and those who had no exposure (P=.04). A crude linear regression showed that "some" social media use (P=.02) and 1 hour of exposure to social media (P<.001) were associated with perceived stress. Adjusting for sociodemographic variables revealed no associations with this outcome variable. In a crude logistic regression, some social media use (P<.001) and 2 to 5 hours of exposure to social media (P=.03) were associated with GAD. Adjusting for the indicated variables showed that some social network use (P<.001) and 1 hour (P=.04) and 2 to 5 hours (P=.03) of exposure to social media were associated with GAD.

conclusionsOlder people, especially women, were often exposed to COVID-19-related information through television and social networks; this affected their mental health, specifically GAD and stress. Thus, the impact of the infodemic should be considered during anamnesis for older people, so that they can share their feelings about it and receive appropriate psychosocial care.

Indexed as

COVID-19COVID-19 pandemichealth communicationhealth of older peopleinformation disseminationmental healthpublic health

Identifiers

PMID37195762
PMCPMC10198717
OpenAlexW4366067923

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.