Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37195664›Full record

Trial reportJAMA network open2023

Incidence of Primary End Point Changes Among Active Cancer Phase 3 Randomized Clinical Trials.

Marcus A Florez, Joseph Abi Jaoude, Roshal R Patel, Ramez Kouzy, Timothy A Lin, Brian De, Esther J Beck, Cullen M Taniguchi, Bruce D Minsky, Clifton D Fuller and 6 more

Open access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase III
In one paragraph

Trial report in JAMA network open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Marcus A FlorezDepartment of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston.
Joseph Abi JaoudeDepartment of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston.
Roshal R PatelDepartment of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston.
Ramez KouzyDepartment of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston.
Timothy A LinDepartment of Radiation Oncology, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
Brian DeDepartment of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston.
Esther J BeckDepartment of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston.
Cullen M TaniguchiDepartment of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston.
Bruce D MinskyDepartment of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston.
Clifton D FullerDepartment of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston.
J Jack LeeDepartment of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston.
Michael KupfermanDepartment of Head and Neck Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston.
Kanwal P RaghavDepartment of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston.
Michael J OvermanDepartment of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston.
Charles R ThomasDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Dartmouth Geisel School of Medicine, Norris Cotton Cancer Center, Lebanon, New Hampshire.
Ethan B LudmirDepartment of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston.
The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · USDartmouth College · USJohns Hopkins Medicine · US

Funding

Tumor Evolution and Metastasis ProgramP30CA016672 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI Scott Kopetz · 1985 to 2026
$290.8M
ESTABLISHING THE ROLE OF BONE MARROW STROMAL ANTIGEN 2 IN HEMATOPOIETIC STEM CELL NICHE INTERACTIONS AND ACTIVATIONF31HL156500 · NHLBI · BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE · PI FLOREZ, MARCUS ALEXANDER · 2021 to 2023
$135k
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA016672NHLBI NIH HHS F31 HL156500
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Primary end point (PEP) changes to an active clinical trial raise questions regarding trial quality and the risk of outcome reporting bias. It is unknown how the frequency and transparency of the reported changes depend on reporting method and whether the PEP changes are associated with trial positivity (ie, the trial met the prespecified statistical threshold for PEP positivity). Objectives: To assess the frequency of reported PEP changes in oncology randomized clinical trials (RCTs) and whether these changes are associated with trial positivity. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cross-sectional study used publicly available data for complete oncology phase 3 RCTs registered in ClinicalTrials.gov from inception through February 2020. Main Outcomes and Measures: The main outcome was change between the initial PEP and the final reported PEP, assessed using 3 methods: (1) history of tracked changes on ClinicalTrials.gov, (2) self-reported changes noted in the article, and (3) changes reported within the protocol, including all available protocol documents. Logistic regression analyses were performed to evaluate whether PEP changes were associated with US Food and Drug Administration approval or trial positivity. Results: Of 755 included trials, 145 (19.2%) had PEP changes found by at least 1 of the 3 detection methods. Of the 145 trials with PEP changes, 102 (70.3%) did not have PEP changes disclosed within the manuscript. There was significant variability in rates of PEP detection by each method (χ2 = 72.1; P < .001). Across all methods, PEP changes were detected at higher rates when multiple versions of the protocol (47 of 148 [31.8%]) were available compared with 1 version (22 of 134 [16.4%]) or no protocol (76 of 473 [16.1%]) (χ2 = 18.7; P < .001). Multivariable analysis demonstrated that PEP changes were associated with trial positivity (odds ratio, 1.86; 95% CI, 1.25-2.82; P = .003). Conclusions and Relevance: This cross-sectional study revealed substantial rates of PEP changes among active RCTs; PEP changes were markedly underreported in published articles and mostly occurred after reported study completion dates. Significant discrepancies in the rate of detected PEP changes call into question the role of increased protocol transparency and completeness in identifying key changes occurring in active trials.

Indexed as

Medical OncologyNeoplasmsBiasHumansIncidenceRandomized Controlled Trials as Topic

Identifiers

PMID37195664
PMCPMC10193180
OpenAlexW4376872635

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.