Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37195660›Full record

ArticleJAMA network open2023

A Novel Informatics Tool to Detect Periprocedural Antibiotic Allergy Adverse Events for Near Real-time Surveillance to Support Audit and Feedback.

Samira Reyes Dassum, Hillary J Mull, Samuel Golenbock, Rebecca P Lamkin, Isabella Epshtein, Marlena H Shin, Judith M Strymish, Kimberly G Blumenthal, Kathryn Colborn, Westyn Branch-Elliman

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA network open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05020418 (Promoting De-Implementation of Inappropriate Antimicrobial Use in Cardiac Device Procedures By Expanding Audit and Feedback), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 91% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05020418 nacompletednot on this map

Promoting De-Implementation of Inappropriate Antimicrobial Use in Cardiac Device Procedures By Expanding Audit and Feedback

TypeinterventionalSponsorVA Office of Research and DevelopmentRan2023 to 2025Enrolled5,469ConditionsAntibiotics Causing Adverse Effects in Therapeutic UseArmsChart Review
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Samira Reyes DassumDepartment of Infectious Disease, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts.
Hillary J MullCenter for Organization and Implementation Research, VA Boston Healthcare System, Boston, Massachusetts.
Samuel GolenbockCenter for Organization and Implementation Research, VA Boston Healthcare System, Boston, Massachusetts.
Rebecca P LamkinCenter for Organization and Implementation Research, VA Boston Healthcare System, Boston, Massachusetts.
Isabella EpshteinCenter for Organization and Implementation Research, VA Boston Healthcare System, Boston, Massachusetts.
Marlena H ShinCenter for Organization and Implementation Research, VA Boston Healthcare System, Boston, Massachusetts.
Judith M StrymishSection of Infectious Disease, Department of Medicine, VA Boston Healthcare System, Boston, Massachusetts.
Kimberly G BlumenthalDivision of Rheumatology, Allergy, and Immunology, Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston.
Kathryn ColbornDepartment of Surgery, University of Colorado, Aurora.
Westyn Branch-EllimanCenter for Organization and Implementation Research, VA Boston Healthcare System, Boston, Massachusetts.
VA Boston Healthcare System · USHarvard University · USBeth Israel Deaconess Medical Center · USUniversity of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus · US

Funding

HSRD VA I01 HX003234
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Standardized processes for identifying when allergic-type reactions occur and linking reactions to drug exposures are limited. Objective: To develop an informatics tool to improve detection of antibiotic allergic-type events. Design, Setting, and Participants: This retrospective cohort study was conducted from October 1, 2015, to September 30, 2019, with data analyzed between July 1, 2021, and January 31, 2022. The study was conducted across Veteran Affairs hospitals among patients who underwent cardiovascular implantable electronic device (CIED) procedures and received periprocedural antibiotic prophylaxis. The cohort was split into training and test cohorts, and cases were manually reviewed to determine presence of allergic-type reaction and its severity. Variables potentially indicative of allergic-type reactions were selected a priori and included allergies entered in the Veteran Affair's Allergy Reaction Tracking (ART) system (either historical [reported] or observed), allergy diagnosis codes, medications administered to treat allergic reactions, and text searches of clinical notes for keywords and phrases indicative of a potential allergic-type reaction. A model to detect allergic-type reaction events was iteratively developed on the training cohort and then applied to the test cohort. Algorithm test characteristics were assessed. Exposure: Preprocedural and postprocedural prophylactic antibiotic administration. Main Outcomes and Measures: Antibiotic allergic-type reactions. Results: The cohort of 36 344 patients included 34 703 CIED procedures with antibiotic exposures (mean [SD] age, 72 [10] years; 34 008 [98%] male patients); median duration of postprocedural prophylaxis was 4 days (IQR, 2-7 days; maximum, 45 days). The final algorithm included 7 variables: entries in the Veteran Affair's hospitals ART, either historic (odds ratio [OR], 42.37; 95% CI, 11.33-158.43) or observed (OR, 175.10; 95% CI, 44.84-683.76); PheCodes for "symptoms affecting skin" (OR, 8.49; 95% CI, 1.90-37.82), "urticaria" (OR, 7.01; 95% CI, 1.76-27.89), and "allergy or adverse event to an antibiotic" (OR, 11.84, 95% CI, 2.88-48.69); keyword detection in clinical notes (OR, 3.21; 95% CI, 1.27-8.08); and antihistamine administration alone or in combination (OR, 6.51; 95% CI, 1.90-22.30). In the final model, antibiotic allergic-type reactions were identified with an estimated probability of 30% or more; positive predictive value was 61% (95% CI, 45%-76%); and sensitivity was 87% (95% CI, 70%-96%). Conclusions and Relevance: In this retrospective cohort study of patients receiving periprocedural antibiotic prophylaxis, an algorithm with a high sensitivity to detect incident antibiotic allergic-type reactions that can be used to provide clinician feedback about antibiotic harms from unnecessarily prolonged antibiotic exposures was developed.

Indexed as

Drug HypersensitivityHypersensitivityAgedAnti-Bacterial AgentsFeedbackFemaleHumansMaleRetrospective StudiesAnti-Bacterial Agents

Identifiers

PMID37195660
PMCPMC10193175
OpenAlexW4376872188

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.