Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37195652›Full record

ArticleHealth promotion and chronic disease prevention in Canada : research, policy and practice2023

Sex differences in children's exposure to food and beverage advertisements on broadcast television in four cities in Canada.

Monique Potvin Kent, Julia Soares Guimarães, Ashley Amson, Elise Pauzé, Lauren Remedios, Mariangela Bagnato, Meghan Pritchard, Ajiri Onwo, David Wu, Mary L'Abbé and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health promotion and chronic disease prevention in Canada : research, policy and practice, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Monique Potvin KentSchool of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Julia Soares GuimarãesInterdisciplinary School of Health Sciences, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Ashley AmsonInterdisciplinary School of Health Sciences, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Elise PauzéInterdisciplinary School of Health Sciences, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Lauren RemediosSchool of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Mariangela BagnatoSchool of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Meghan PritchardSchool of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Ajiri OnwoDepartment of Biology, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
David WuSchulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada.
Mary L'AbbéDepartment of Nutritional Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Christine MulliganDepartment of Nutritional Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Laura VergeerDepartment of Nutritional Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Madyson WeippertDepartment of Nutritional Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionSex differences exist in children's obesity rates, dietary patterns and television viewing. Television continues to be a source of unhealthy food advertising exposure to children in Canada. Our objective was to examine sex differences in food advertising exposure in children aged 2 to 17 years across four Canadian English language markets.

methodsWe licensed 24-hour television advertising data from the company Numerator for January through December 2019, in four cities (Vancouver, Calgary, Montréal and Toronto) across Canada. Child food advertising exposure overall, by food category, television station, Health Canada's proposed nutrient profiling model, and marketing techniques were examined on the 10 most popular television stations among children and compared by sex. Advertising exposure was estimated using gross rating points, and sex differences were described using relative and absolute differences.

resultsBoth male and female children were exposed to an elevated level of unhealthy food advertising and a plethora of marketing techniques across all four cities. Differences between sexes were evident between and within cities. Compared to females, males in Vancouver and Montréal viewed respectively 24.7% and 24.0% more unhealthy food ads/person/year and were exposed to 90.2 and 133.4 more calls to action, 93.3 and 97.8 more health appeals, and 88.4 and 81.0 more products that appeal to children.

conclusionTelevision is a significant source of children's exposure to food advertising, with clear sex differences. Policy makers need to consider sex when developing food advertising restrictions and monitoring efforts.

Indexed as

AdvertisingSex CharacteristicsBeveragesCanadaChildCitiesFemaleFood IndustryHumansMaleTelevisionadolescentschildrenfood advertisingmarketing techniquessex differencestelevision exposure

Identifiers

PMID37195652
PMCPMC10237258

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.