ReviewCurrent treatment options in oncology2023
Measurable Residual Disease in Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia: Current Understanding and Evolving Role in Clinical Practice.
Review in Current treatment options in oncology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Orelabrutinib, fludarabine, cyclophosphamide, and obinutuzumab (OFCG) for first-line treatment of chronic lymphocytic leukemia: a multicenter phase II trial (cwCLL-001 trial).Journal of the National Cancer Center · 2026Article
- Research Progress on the KMT2A-AFF3 Fusion Gene in Childhood Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia: Mechanisms, Clinical Implications, and Therapeutic Strategies.Current issues in molecular biology · 2025Review
- Frontline Therapy of CLL-Changing Treatment Paradigms.Current hematologic malignancy reports · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
opinion statementTreatment of chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) has evolved dramatically during the last decade, from chemoimmunotherapy (CIT)-based therapies to newer B-cell receptor (BCR) signaling targeting agents, which are sometimes given as continuous schemes. Response to treatment was traditionally defined according to clinical variables designed to assign a response category. Interest in assessing for deeper responses in CLL by the means of measurable residual disease (MRD) testing has been the subject of research during the last several years. Analyses and sub-analyses of clinical trials have shown that achieving undetectable MRD (uMRD) in CLL is an important prognostic factor. In this review, we summarize the available evidence about MRD in CLL, from the various assays available for measurement, the compartment to test, the impact of reaching uMRD according to the treatment regimen, and the results of fixed duration treatment guided by MRD trials. Finally, we summarize how MRD can be incorporated in clinical practice and how it may guide fixed duration treatment in the future should evidence continue to accumulate in that direction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
37195588What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.