Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37195575›Full record

ArticleHealth expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy2023

Strengthening mental health research outcomes through genuine partnerships with young people with lived or living experience: A pilot evaluation study.

Grace Yeeun Lee, Sarah McKenna, Yun Ju C Song, Alexis Hutcheon, Samuel J Hockey, Rachael Laidler, Jo-An Occhipinti, Claudia Perry, Tara Lindsay-Smith, Annabel Ramsay and 10 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
5.7field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Meta-Research on the Science of Lived Experience Engagement in Mental Health and Substance Use Health Research: A Scoping Review and Qualitative Synthesis.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2026
    Article
  2. One Eye Open: Reflections on Embedding Lived Experience in Sleep, Circadian Rhythms, and Mood Disorder Research.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Collaborating With Young People: Identifying the Barriers and Facilitators in Co-Designed Research.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2025
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. The League: A person-centred approach to the development of social robotics for paediatric anxiety.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2024
    Article
  10. Strengthening mental health research outcomes through genuine partnerships with young people with lived or living experience: A pilot evaluation study.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Grace Yeeun LeeBrain and Mind Centre, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-7234-1870
Sarah McKennaBrain and Mind Centre, New South Wales, Australia.
Yun Ju C SongBrain and Mind Centre, New South Wales, Australia.
Alexis HutcheonBrain and Mind Centre, New South Wales, Australia.
Samuel J HockeyBrain and Mind Centre, New South Wales, Australia.
Rachael LaidlerBrain and Mind Centre, New South Wales, Australia.
Jo-An OcchipintiBrain and Mind Centre, New South Wales, Australia.
Claudia PerryBrain and Mind Centre, New South Wales, Australia.
Tara Lindsay-SmithBrain and Mind Centre, New South Wales, Australia.
Annabel RamsayBrain and Mind Centre, New South Wales, Australia.
Skye ChoiBrain and Mind Centre, New South Wales, Australia.
Dakota FeirerBrain and Mind Centre, New South Wales, Australia.
Andrew W ShimBrain and Mind Centre, New South Wales, Australia.
Jessica CottleBrain and Mind Centre, New South Wales, Australia.
Anith MukherjeeBrain and Mind Centre, New South Wales, Australia.
Joshua NewBrain and Mind Centre, New South Wales, Australia.
Rebecca YuBrain and Mind Centre, New South Wales, Australia.
Elizabeth Mary ScottBrain and Mind Centre, New South Wales, Australia.
Louise FreebairnNational Centre for Epidemiology and Population Health, The University of Canberra, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, Australia.
Ian Bernard HickieBrain and Mind Centre, New South Wales, Australia.
Mind Australia · AUAustralian National University · AU

Funding

This research study is supported by philanthropic funding, for which donors are families affected with lived mental health experiences and wish to remain anonymous
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDespite increasing support for stakeholder inclusion in research, there is limited evaluative research to guide safe (i.e., youth-friendly) and meaningful (i.e., non-tokenistic) partnerships with young people with lived experience of mental ill-health in research. This paper describes a pilot evaluation and iterative design of a Youth Lived Experience Working Group (LEWG) protocol that was established by the Youth Mental Health and Technology team at The University of Sydney's Brain and Mind Centre, based on the results of two studies.

methodsStudy one consisted of a pilot evaluation of the extent to which youth partners felt empowered to contribute, to qualitatively explore how LEWG processes could be improved. Youth partners completed online surveys, and results were shared over two LEWG meetings in 2021 to empower youth partners to collectively identify actions of positive change regarding LEWG processes. These meetings were audio-recorded and transcripts were subsequently coded using thematic analysis. Study two assessed whether LEWG processes and proposed improvements were acceptable and feasible from the perspective of academic researchers via an online survey in 2022.

resultsQuantitative and qualitative data collected from nine youth partners and 42 academic researchers uncovered initial learnings regarding facilitators, motivators, and barriers to partnering with young people with lived experience in research. Implementing clear processes for youth partners and academic researchers on effective partnership strategies, providing training opportunities for youth partners to develop research skills, and providing regular updates on how youth partner contributions led to research outcomes were identified as key facilitators.

conclusionsThis pilot study provides insight into a growing international field on how to optimise participatory processes so that researchers and young people with lived experience can be better supported and engaged to make meaningful contributions to mental health research. We argue that more transparency is needed around participatory research processes so that partnerships with young people with lived experience are not merely tokenistic. CONSUMER CONTRIBUTIONS: Our study has also been approved by and reflects the concepts and priorities of our youth lived experience partners and lived experience researchers, all of whom are authors of this paper.

Indexed as

EmotionsMental HealthAdolescentHumansPilot Projectsconsumer partnershipempowerment evaluationlived experiencenothing about us without usparticipatory action researchresearcher-youth lived experience partnershipyouth mental health

Identifiers

PMID37195575
PMCPMC10349217
OpenAlexW4376871450

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.