ArticleDrug safety2023
Safety and Effectiveness of Rasagiline in Chinese Patients with Parkinson's Disease: A Prospective, Multicenter, Non-interventional Post-marketing Study.
Article in Drug safety, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Parkinson's disease: pathogenesis and therapeutic strategies.Molecular biomedicine · 2026Review
- Identification of Key Active Constituents inInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors at 11 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionRasagiline is indicated for treating idiopathic Parkinson's disease (PD) as monotherapy and adjunct therapy to levodopa in patients.
objectivesTo assess the post-marketing safety and tolerability of rasagiline in Chinese PD patients, as well as its effectiveness in improving motor symptoms.
methodsThis prospective, non-interventional, multicenter, cohort study included PD patients administered rasagiline monotherapy or adjunct therapy to levodopa. The primary outcome was the incidence of adverse drug reactions (ADRs) according to MedDRA
resultsIn total, 734 patients, 95 in the monotherapy subgroup and 639 in the adjunct therapy subgroup, were included in the safety population. The incidence rates of all ADRs were comparable between the monotherapy (15.8%) and adjunct therapy (13.6%) subgroups. The most common ADRs by system organ class were nervous system disorders (5.6%), gastrointestinal disorders (3.3%), psychiatric disorders (1.8%), vascular disorders (1.2%), and general disorders and administration site conditions (1.1%). Five (0.7%) participants experienced 5 serious ADRs. Improvements in UPDRS part III, CGI-S and CGI-I at Weeks 4, 12 and 24 from baseline were observed.
conclusionsSafety data in this study indicated no extra safety concerns. Rasagiline is generally safe and well tolerated in Chinese PD patients. The safety profile and tolerability were in line with the established safety profile. Moreover, rasagiline reduced the severity of PD motor symptoms, confirming findings by previous clinical trials.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.