Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37195529›Full record

ArticleAdvances in experimental medicine and biology2023

Engineering Large Airways.

Tehreem Khalid, Cian O'Leary

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Advances in experimental medicine and biology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
7.3field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Tehreem KhalidSchool of Pharmacy and Biomolecular Sciences, RCSI University of Medicine and Health Sciences, Dublin, Ireland.
Cian O'LearySchool of Pharmacy and Biomolecular Sciences, RCSI University of Medicine and Health Sciences, Dublin, Ireland. cianoleary@rcsi.com.
Texas Instruments (Ireland) · IE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A key issue facing trachea replacement attempts has been the discrepancy of the mechanical properties between the native tracheal tissue and that of the replacement construct; this difference is often one of the major causes for implant failure in vivo and within clinical efforts. The trachea is composed of distinct structural regions, with each component fulfilling a different role in maintaining overall tracheal stability. The trachea's horseshoe-shaped hyaline cartilage rings, smooth muscle and annular ligament collectively produce an anisotropic tissue that allows for longitudinal extensibility and lateral rigidity. Therefore, any tracheal substitute must be mechanically robust in order to withstand intra-thoracic pressure changes that occur during respiration. Conversely, they must also be able to deform radially to allow for changes in the cross-sectional area during coughing and swallowing. These complicated native tissue characteristics, coupled with a lack of standardised protocols to accurately quantify tracheal biomechanics as guidance for implant design, constitute a significant hurdle for tracheal biomaterial scaffold fabrication. This chapter aims to highlight the pressure forces exerted on the trachea and how they can influence tracheal construct design and also the biomechanical properties of the three main components of the trachea and how to mechanically assess them.

Indexed as

Prostheses and ImplantsTracheaBiomechanical PhenomenaHyaline CartilageMuscle, SmoothTissue EngineeringBiomechanicsMechanical testingTrachea pressure

Identifiers

PMID37195529
OpenAlexW4376872738

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.