ArticleEuropean journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging2023
A machine learning method integrating ECG and gated SPECT for cardiac resynchronization therapy decision support.
Article in European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Artificial intelligence models in prediction of response to cardiac resynchronization therapy: a systematic review.Heart failure reviews · 2024Pooled it
- A New Method of Modeling the Multi-stage Decision-Making Process of CRT Using Machine Learning with Uncertainty Quantification.Journal of imaging informatics in medicine · 2026Article
- Clinical phenotypes among patients that underwent cardiac resynchronization therapy using unsupervised learning integrating gated SPECT.Nuclear medicine communications · 2025Article
- Utilizing multimodal artificial intelligence to advance cardiovascular diseases.Precision clinical medicine · 2025Review
- AI in SPECT Imaging: Opportunities and Challenges.Seminars in nuclear medicine · 2025Review
- Predicting cardiac resynchronization therapy response: development and validation of a single photon emission computed tomography-based nomogram.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2025Article
- Role of Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning to Create Predictors, Enhance Molecular Understanding, and Implement Purposeful Programs for Myocardial Recovery.Methodist DeBakey cardiovascular journal · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
Abstract
purposeCardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) has been established as an important therapy for heart failure. Mechanical dyssynchrony has the potential to predict responders to CRT. The aim of this study was to report the development and the validation of machine learning models which integrate ECG, gated SPECT MPI (GMPS), and clinical variables to predict patients' response to CRT.
methodsThis analysis included 153 patients who met criteria for CRT from a prospective cohort study. The variables were used to model predictive methods for CRT. Patients were classified as "responders" for an increase of LVEF ≥ 5% at follow-up. In a second analysis, patients were classified as "super-responders" for an increase of LVEF ≥ 15%. For ML, variable selection was applied, and Prediction Analysis of Microarrays (PAM) approach was used to model response while Naïve Bayes (NB) was used to model super-response. These ML models were compared to models obtained with guideline variables.
resultsPAM had AUC of 0.80 against 0.72 of partial least squares-discriminant analysis with guideline variables (p = 0.52). The sensitivity (0.86) and specificity (0.75) were better than for guideline alone, sensitivity (0.75) and specificity (0.24). Neural network with guideline variables was better than NB (AUC = 0.93 vs. 0.87) however without statistical significance (p = 0.48). Its sensitivity and specificity (1.0 and 0.75, respectively) were better than guideline alone (0.78 and 0.25, respectively).
conclusionsCompared to guideline criteria, ML methods trended toward improved CRT response and super-response prediction. GMPS was central in the acquisition of most parameters. Further studies are needed to validate the models.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.