Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37195416›Full record

ArticleToxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology2023

Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) in mixtures show additive effects on transcriptomic points of departure in human liver spheroids.

Gregory C Addicks, Andrea Rowan-Carroll, Anthony J F Reardon, Karen Leingartner, Andrew Williams, Matthew J Meier, Ivy Moffat, Richard Carrier, Luigi Lorusso, Barbara A Wetmore and 2 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
6.2field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 44 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Rapid behavioral screening in the planarianFrontiers in toxicology · 2026
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Incorporating new approach methods (NAMs) data in dose-response assessments: The future is now!Journal of toxicology and environmental health. Part B, Critical reviews · 2025
    Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Gregory C AddicksEnvironmental Health Science and Research Bureau, Healthy Environments and Consumer Safety Branch (HECSB), Health Canada, Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0K9, Canada.
Andrea Rowan-CarrollEnvironmental Health Science and Research Bureau, Healthy Environments and Consumer Safety Branch (HECSB), Health Canada, Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0K9, Canada.
Anthony J F ReardonEnvironmental Health Science and Research Bureau, Healthy Environments and Consumer Safety Branch (HECSB), Health Canada, Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0K9, Canada.
Karen LeingartnerEnvironmental Health Science and Research Bureau, Healthy Environments and Consumer Safety Branch (HECSB), Health Canada, Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0K9, Canada.
Andrew WilliamsEnvironmental Health Science and Research Bureau, Healthy Environments and Consumer Safety Branch (HECSB), Health Canada, Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0K9, Canada.
Matthew J MeierEnvironmental Health Science and Research Bureau, Healthy Environments and Consumer Safety Branch (HECSB), Health Canada, Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0K9, Canada.
Ivy MoffatWater and Air Quality Bureau, HECSB, Health Canada, Health Canada, Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0K9, Canada.
Richard CarrierWater and Air Quality Bureau, HECSB, Health Canada, Health Canada, Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0K9, Canada.
Luigi LorussoChemicals and Environmental Health Management Bureau, Healthy Environments and Consumer Safety Branch (HECSB), Health Canada, Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0K9, Canada.
Barbara A WetmoreCenter for Computational Toxicology and Exposure, Office of Research and Development, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27711, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6878-5348
Carole L YaukDepartment of Biology, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario K1N 6N5, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-6725-3454
Ella AtlasEnvironmental Health Science and Research Bureau, Healthy Environments and Consumer Safety Branch (HECSB), Health Canada, Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0K9, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-4410-4402
Health Canada · CAEnvironmental Protection Agency · USUniversity of Ottawa · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) are a wide range of chemicals that are used in a variety of consumer and industrial products leading to direct human exposure. Many PFAS are chemically nonreactive and persistent in the environment, resulting in additional exposure from water, soil, and dietary intake. While some PFAS have documented negative health effects, data on simultaneous exposures to multiple PFAS (PFAS mixtures) are inadequate for making informed decisions for risk assessment. The current study leverages data from previous work in our group using Templated Oligo-Sequencing (TempO-Seq) for high-throughput transcriptomic analysis of PFAS-exposed primary human liver cell spheroids; herein, we determine the transcriptomic potency of PFAS in mixtures. Gene expression data from single PFAS and mixture exposures of liver cell spheroids were subject to benchmark concentration (BMC) analysis. We used the 25th lowest gene BMC as the point of departure to compare the potencies of single PFAS to PFAS mixtures of varying complexity and composition. Specifically, the empirical potency of 8 PFAS mixtures were compared to predicted mixture potencies calculated using the principal of concentration addition (ie, dose addition) in which mixture component potencies are summed by proportion to predict mixture potency. In this study, for most mixtures, empirical mixture potencies were comparable to potencies calculated through concentration addition. This work supports that the effects of PFAS mixtures on gene expression largely follow the concentration addition predicted response and suggests that effects of these individual PFAS in mixtures are not strongly synergistic or antagonistic.

Indexed as

Alkanesulfonic AcidsFluorocarbonsEatingHepatocytesHumansLiverTranscriptomeAlkanesulfonic AcidsFluorocarbonsbenchmark concentrationliver spheroidsmixture toxicitynew approach methodologyPFASTempO-Seq

Identifiers

PMID37195416
PMCPMC10306399
OpenAlexW4376871529

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.