Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37195350›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of pediatrics2023

The neonatal DAV-expert algorithm: a GAVeCeLT/GAVePed consensus for the choice of the most appropriate venous access in newborns.

Giovanni Barone, Vito D'Andrea, Gina Ancora, Francesco Cresi, Luca Maggio, Antonella Capasso, Rossella Mastroianni, Nicola Pozzi, Carmen Rodriguez-Perez, Maria Grazia Romitti and 4 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract readConsensus Statement
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of pediatrics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
16.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 46 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Observational
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 9 institutions in 1 country.

Giovanni BaroneNeonatal Intensive Care Unit, Infermi Hospital, AUSL Della Romagna, Viale Settembrini 2, Rimini, Italy. gbarone85@yahoo.it.
Vito D'AndreaNeonatal Intensive Care Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
Gina AncoraNeonatal Intensive Care Unit, Infermi Hospital, AUSL Della Romagna, Viale Settembrini 2, Rimini, Italy.
Francesco CresiNeonatology and Neonatal Intensive Care Unit, Sant'Anna Hospital, University of Turin, Città Della Salute E Della Scienza, Turin, Italy.
Luca MaggioNeonatology and Neonatal Intensive Care Unit, AO San Camillo Forlanini, Rome, Italy.
Antonella CapassoNeonatology and Neonatal Intensive Care Unit, A.O.U. Federico 2, Naples, Italy.
Rossella MastroianniNeonatal Intensive Care Unit, S. Anna E S. Sebastiano Hospital, Caserta, Italy.
Nicola PozziNeonatal Intensive Care Unit, San Pio Hospital, Benevento, Italy.
Carmen Rodriguez-PerezNeonatology and Neonatal Intensive Care Unit, ASST Spedali Civili, Ospedale Dei Bambini, Brescia, Italy.
Maria Grazia RomittiNeonatal Intensive Care Unit, Fondazione Poliambulanza, Brescia, Italy.
Francesca TotaNeonatal Intensive Care Unit, Ospedale S. Chiara, APSS, Trento, Italy.
Ferdinando SpagnuoloNeonatal Intensive Care Unit, AOU Università Degli Studi Della Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Naples, Italy.
Francesco RaimondiNeonatology and Neonatal Intensive Care Unit, A.O.U. Federico 2, Naples, Italy.
Mauro PittirutiDepartment of Surgery, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
Agostino Gemelli University Polyclinic · ITFederico II University Hospital · ITOspedale Infermi di Rimini · ITAzienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Università degli Studi della Campania Luigi Vanvitelli · ITFondazione Poliambulanza Istituto Ospedaliero · ITOspedale dei Bambini Vittore Buzzi · ITOspedale Santa Chiara · ITOspedale Sant'Anna · ITOspedale Sant'Anna · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In most NICUs, the choice of the venous access device currently relies upon the operator's experience and preferences. However, considering the high failure rate of vascular devices in the neonatal population, such clinical choice has a critical relevance and should preferably be based on the best available evidence. Though some algorithms have been published over the last 5 years, none of them seems in line with the current scientific evidence. Thus, the GAVePed-which is the pediatric interest group of the most important Italian group on venous access, GAVeCeLT-has developed a national consensus about the choice of the venous access device in the neonatal population. After a systematic review of the available evidence, the panel of the consensus (which included Italian neonatologists specifically experts in this area) has provided structured recommendations answering four sets of questions regarding (1) umbilical venous catheters, (2) peripheral cannulas, (3) epicutaneo-cava catheters, and (4) ultrasound-guided centrally and femorally inserted central catheters. Only statements reaching a complete agreement were included in the final recommendations. All recommendations were also structured as a simple visual algorithm, so as to be easily translated into clinical practice.  Conclusion: The goal of the present consensus is to offer a systematic set of recommendations on the choice of the most appropriate vascular access device in Neonatal Intensive Care Unit.

Indexed as

Catheterization, Central VenousCatheterization, PeripheralCentral Venous CathetersCatheters, IndwellingHumansInfant, NewbornIntensive Care Units, NeonatalCentral venous catheterIndicationsNeonatal intensive care unitUltrasound-guided catheterUmbilical venous catheterVascular access devices

Identifiers

PMID37195350
OpenAlexW4376872714

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.