Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37195305›Full record

SynthesisPediatric radiology2023

Current state of radiomics in pediatric neuro-oncology practice: a systematic review.

Ibrahem Albalkhi, Aashim Bhatia, Nico Lösch, Robert Goetti, Kshitij Mankad

Abstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Pediatric radiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Incidental brain tumor findings in children: prevalence, natural history, management, controversies, challenges, and dilemmas.Child's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery · 2024
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.

Ibrahem AlbalkhiCollege of Medicine Research Lab, Alfaisal University, Riyadh, KSA, Saudi Arabia. ibrahimnasserofficial@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0002-2729-514X
Aashim BhatiaDepartment of Neuroradiology, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Nico LöschBiomedical Data Science Lab, University of Technology Sydney, Ultimo, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-5922-6018
Robert GoettiDepartment of Medical Imaging, The Children's Hospital at Westmead, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
Kshitij MankadDepartment of Neuroradiology, Great Ormond Street Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Great Ormond St, London, WC1N 3JH, UK.
Alfaisal University · SAChildren's Hospital of Philadelphia · USGreat Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation Trust · GBThe University of Sydney · AUUniversity of Technology Sydney · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRadiomics is the process of converting radiological images into high-dimensional data that may be used to create machine learning models capable of predicting clinical outcomes, such as disease progression, treatment response and survival. Pediatric central nervous system (CNS) tumors differ from adult CNS tumors in terms of their tissue morphology, molecular subtype and textural features. We set out to appraise the current impact of this technology in clinical pediatric neuro-oncology practice.

objectivesThe aims of the study were to assess radiomics' current impact and potential utility in pediatric neuro-oncology practice; to evaluate the accuracy of radiomics-based machine learning models and compare this to the current standard which is stereotactic brain biopsy; and finally, to identify the current limitations of radiomics applications in pediatric neuro-oncology. MATERIALS AND

methodsFollowing the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) standards, a systematic review of the literature was carried out with protocol number CRD42022372485 in the prospective register of systematic reviews (PROSPERO). We performed a systematic literature search via PubMed, Embase, Web of Science and Google Scholar. Studies involving CNS tumors, studies that utilized radiomics and studies involving pediatric patients (age<18 years) were included. Several parameters were collected including imaging modality, sample size, image segmentation technique, machine learning model used, tumor type, radiomics utility, model accuracy, radiomics quality score and reported limitations.

resultsThe study included a total of 17 articles that underwent full-text review, after excluding duplicates, conference abstracts and studies that did not meet the inclusion criteria. The most commonly used machine learning models were support vector machines (n=7) and random forests (n=6), with an area under the curve (AUC) range of 0.60-0.94. The included studies investigated several pediatric CNS tumors, with ependymoma and medulloblastoma being the most frequently studied. Radiomics was primarily used for lesion identification, molecular subtyping, survival prognostication and metastasis prediction in pediatric neuro-oncology. The low sample size of studies was a commonly reported limitation.

conclusionThe current state of radiomics in pediatric neuro-oncology is promising, in terms of distinguishing between tumor types; however, its utility in response assessment requires further evaluation which, given the relatively low number of pediatric tumors, calls for multicenter collaboration.

Indexed as

Machine LearningRadiologyAdolescentAdultArea Under CurveBiopsyChildDisease ProgressionHumansMulticenter Studies as TopicArtificial intelligenceBrainChildrenGliomaNeoplasm

Identifiers

PMID37195305
OpenAlexW4376871701

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.