Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37195144›Full record

ArticleEpilepsia2023

Multimodal nocturnal seizure detection in children with epilepsy: A prospective, multicenter, long-term, in-home trial.

Anouk van Westrhenen, Richard H C Lazeron, Johannes P van Dijk, Frans S S Leijten, Roland D Thijs, Dutch TeleEpilepsy Consortium

Registry-linked trialOpen access · greenAbstract readMulticenter Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Epilepsia, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03909984 (Promoting Implementation of Seizure Detection Devices in Epilepsy Care), which is not on this map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
8.5field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03909984 nacompletednot on this map

Promoting Implementation of Seizure Detection Devices in Epilepsy Care: the PROMISE Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorStichting Epilepsie Instellingen NederlandRan2018 to 2021Enrolled60ConditionsEpilepsy in ChildrenArmsNightwatch
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Holistic management of epilepsy in adults with intellectual development disorders.Epileptic disorders : international epilepsy journal with videotape · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Seizure Detection Devices.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Anouk van WestrhenenStichting Epilepsie Instellingen Nederland (SEIN), Heemstede and Zwolle, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-1987-5793
Richard H C LazeronAcademic Center of Epileptology Kempenhaeghe, Heeze, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-5570-8872
Johannes P van DijkAcademic Center of Epileptology Kempenhaeghe, Heeze, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-6188-2973
Frans S S LeijtenBrain Center, Department of Neurology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-2603-3364
Roland D ThijsStichting Epilepsie Instellingen Nederland (SEIN), Heemstede and Zwolle, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-1435-8970
Dutch TeleEpilepsy Consortium
Leiden University Medical Center · NLKempenhaeghe · NLUniversität Ulm · DEUniversity Medical Center Utrecht · NL

Funding

ZonMw 446001009
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThere is a pressing need for reliable automated seizure detection in epilepsy care. Performance evidence on ambulatory non-electroencephalography-based seizure detection devices is low, and evidence on their effect on caregiver's stress, sleep, and quality of life (QoL) is still lacking. We aimed to determine the performance of NightWatch, a wearable nocturnal seizure detection device, in children with epilepsy in the family home setting and to assess its impact on caregiver burden.

methodsWe conducted a phase 4, multicenter, prospective, video-controlled, in-home NightWatch implementation study (NCT03909984). We included children aged 4-16 years, with ≥1 weekly nocturnal major motor seizure, living at home. We compared a 2-month baseline period with a 2-month NightWatch intervention. The primary outcome was the detection performance of NightWatch for major motor seizures (focal to bilateral or generalized tonic-clonic [TC] seizures, focal to bilateral or generalized tonic seizures lasting >30 s, hyperkinetic seizures, and a remainder category of focal to bilateral or generalized clonic seizures and "TC-like" seizures). Secondary outcomes included caregivers' stress (Caregiver Strain Index [CSI]), sleep (Pittsburgh Quality of Sleep Index), and QoL (EuroQol five-dimension five-level scale).

resultsWe included 53 children (55% male, mean age = 9.7 ± 3.6 years, 68% learning disability) and analyzed 2310 nights (28 173 h), including 552 major motor seizures. Nineteen participants did not experience any episode of interest during the trial. The median detection sensitivity per participant was 100% (range = 46%-100%), and the median individual false alarm rate was .04 per hour (range = 0-.53). Caregiver's stress decreased significantly (mean total CSI score = 8.0 vs. 7.1, p = .032), whereas caregiver's sleep and QoL did not change significantly during the trial. SIGNIFICANCE: The NightWatch system demonstrated high sensitivity for detecting nocturnal major motor seizures in children in a family home setting and reduced caregiver stress.

Indexed as

Epilepsy, ReflexEpilepsy, Tonic-ClonicAdolescentChildFemaleHumansMaleProspective StudiesQuality of LifeSeizurescaregiverNightWatchseizure detection deviceSUDEPwearable

Identifiers

PMID37195144
OpenAlexW4376872444

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.