Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37195040›Full record

SynthesisHuman brain mapping2023

Significant heterogeneity in structural asymmetry of the habenula in the human brain: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Yilamujiang Abuduaini, Yi Pu, Paul M Thompson, Xiang-Zhen Kong

Open access · goldAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Human brain mapping, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Surrogate GPR139 Agonists Reverse Short-Term Startle Habituation Impairment in Larval Zebrafish.FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Yilamujiang AbuduainiDepartment of Psychology and Behavioral Sciences, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China.
Yi PuDepartment of Neuroscience, Max Planck Institute for Empirical Aesthetics, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-6184-0535
Paul M ThompsonImaging Genetics Center, Mark & Mary Stevens Institute for Neuroimaging & Informatics, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA.
Xiang-Zhen KongDepartment of Psychology and Behavioral Sciences, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China.ORCID 0000-0002-0805-1350
Max Planck Institute for Empirical Aesthetics · DESir Run Run Shaw Hospital · CNUniversity of Southern California · USZhejiang University · CN

Funding

ENIGMA-SD: Understanding Sex Differences in Global Mental Health through ENIGMAR01MH116147 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI THOMPSON, PAUL M · 2018 to 2021
$2.5M
NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH116147
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Understanding the evolutionarily conserved feature of functional laterality in the habenula has been attracting attention due to its potential role in human cognition and neuropsychiatric disorders. Deciphering the structure of the human habenula remains to be challenging, which resulted in inconsistent findings for brain disorders. Here, we present a large-scale meta-analysis of the left-right differences in the habenular volume in the human brain to provide a clearer picture of the habenular asymmetry. We searched PubMed, Web of Science, and Google Scholar for articles that reported volume data of the bilateral habenula in the human brain, and assessed the left-right differences. We also assessed the potential effects of several moderating variables including the mean age of the participants, magnetic field strengths of the scanners and different disorders by using meta-regression and subgroup analysis. In total 52 datasets (N = 1427) were identified and showed significant heterogeneity in the left-right differences and the unilateral volume per se. Moderator analyses suggested that such heterogeneity was mainly due to different MRI scanners and segmentation approaches used. While inversed asymmetry patterns were suggested in patients with depression (leftward) and schizophrenia (rightward), no significant disorder-related differences relative to healthy controls were found in either the left-right asymmetry or the unilateral volume. This study provides useful data for future studies of brain imaging and methodological developments related to precision habenula measurements, and also helps to further understand potential roles of the habenula in various disorders.

Indexed as

HabenulaCognitionFunctional LateralityHumansMagnetic Resonance Imagingbrain asymmetrybrain disordershabenulaheterogeneitylaterality

Identifiers

PMID37195040
PMCPMC10258539
OpenAlexW4376872047

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.