Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37195029›Full record

ArticleeLife2023

Response outcome gates the effect of spontaneous cortical state fluctuations on perceptual decisions.

Davide Reato, Raphael Steinfeld, André Tacão-Monteiro, Alfonso Renart

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in eLife, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Davide Reato *Champalimaud Research, Champalimaud Foundation, Lisbon, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0001-5362-4616
Raphael Steinfeld *Champalimaud Research, Champalimaud Foundation, Lisbon, Portugal.
André Tacão-MonteiroChampalimaud Research, Champalimaud Foundation, Lisbon, Portugal.
Alfonso RenartChampalimaud Research, Champalimaud Foundation, Lisbon, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0001-7916-9930

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sensory responses of cortical neurons are more discriminable when evoked on a baseline of desynchronized spontaneous activity, but cortical desynchronization has not generally been associated with more accurate perceptual decisions. Here, we show that mice perform more accurate auditory judgments when activity in the auditory cortex is elevated and desynchronized before stimulus onset, but only if the previous trial was an error, and that this relationship is occluded if previous outcome is ignored. We confirmed that the outcome-dependent effect of brain state on performance is neither due to idiosyncratic associations between the slow components of either signal, nor to the existence of specific cortical states evident only after errors. Instead, errors appear to gate the effect of cortical state fluctuations on discrimination accuracy. Neither facial movements nor pupil size during the baseline were associated with accuracy, but they were predictive of measures of responsivity, such as the probability of not responding to the stimulus or of responding prematurely. These results suggest that the functional role of cortical state on behavior is dynamic and constantly regulated by performance monitoring systems.

Indexed as

Auditory CortexBrainAnimalsCortical SynchronizationMiceMovementNeuronsarousalauditory cortexbrain statedecision makingmouseneuroscienceperformance monitoring

Identifiers

PMID37195029
PMCPMC10241512

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.