Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37195028›Full record

Trial reportHuman brain mapping2023

Differential contribution of between and within-brain coupling to movement synchronization.

Inbar Z Marton-Alper, Andrey Markus, Michael Nevat, Rotem Bennet, Simone G Shamay-Tsoory

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Human brain mapping, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Hyperscanning: from inter-brain coupling to causality.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2024
    Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Inbar Z Marton-AlperDepartment of Psychology, University of Haifa, Haifa, Israel.
Andrey MarkusDepartment of Psychology, University of Haifa, Haifa, Israel.ORCID 0000-0001-8658-4112
Michael NevatDepartment of Psychology, University of Haifa, Haifa, Israel.
Rotem BennetDepartment of Psychology, University of Haifa, Haifa, Israel.
Simone G Shamay-TsooryDepartment of Psychology, University of Haifa, Haifa, Israel.
University of Haifa · IL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A fundamental characteristic of the human brain that supports behavior is its capacity to create connections between brain regions. A promising approach holds that during social behavior, brain regions not only create connections with other brain regions within a brain, but also coordinate their activity with other brain regions of an interaction partner. Here we ask whether between-brain and within-brain coupling contribute differentially to movement synchronization. We focused on coupling between the inferior frontal gyrus (IFG), a brain region associated with the observation-execution system, and the dorsomedial prefrontal cortex (dmPFC), a region associated with error-monitoring and prediction. Participants, randomly divided into dyads, were simultaneously scanned with functional near infra-red spectroscopy (fNIRS) while performing an open-ended 3D hand movement task consisting of three conditions: back-to-back movement, free movement, or intentional synchronization. Results show that behavioral synchrony was higher in the intentional synchrony compared with the back-to-back and free movement conditions. Between-brain coupling in the IFG and dmPFC was evident in the free movement and intentional synchrony conditions but not in the back-to-back condition. Importantly, between-brain coupling was found to positively predict intentional synchrony, while within-brain coupling was found to predict synchronization during free movement. These results indicate that during intentional synchronization, brain organization changes such that between-brain networks, but not within-brain connections, contribute to successful communication, pointing to shift from a within-brain feedback loop to a two-brains feedback loop.

Indexed as

BrainSocial BehaviorBrain MappingCommunicationHumansInterpersonal RelationsPrefrontal Cortexhyperscanninginterbrain couplingmovement synchronization

Identifiers

PMID37195028
PMCPMC10258530
OpenAlexW4376872574

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.