Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37194896›Full record

ArticleRevista latino-americana de enfermagem2023

Factors that affect career success of nurses who practice in assisted reproductive technology.

Wang Li, Wen Honggui, Peng Hong, Luo Hong

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Revista latino-americana de enfermagem, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Wang LiWomen and Children's Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Center for Reproductive Medicine, Chongqing, Chongqing, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9568-1803
Wen HongguiWomen and Children's Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Center for Reproductive Medicine, Chongqing, Chongqing, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3628-3976
Peng HongWomen and Children's Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Center for Reproductive Medicine, Chongqing, Chongqing, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9009-9582
Luo HongWomen and Children's Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Center for Reproductive Medicine, Chongqing, Chongqing, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4042-7004

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

to examine the relationship between career success and work environment of nurses who practice in assisted reproductive technology and to identify factors that affect career success. a cross-sectional study conducted in 53 fertility centres in 26 provinces in mainland China. Data were collected using a demographic data questionnaire, a specialised nursing competence questionnaire, the Career-Success Scale, and the Nursing Work Environment Scale. Descriptive and inferential statistics were applied. 597 assisted reproductive technology nurses participated in our survey, and 555 valid questionnaires were collected. Theoverall mean scores for career success and work environment were 3.75 [standard deviation (SD) = 1.01] and 3.42 (SD = 0.77) respectively. There was a strong positive correlation between career success and work environment (r = 0.742, p < 0.01). Multiple regression showed that attending academic conferences, psychological care, professional development, support and care, salary, and welfare were significant factors that influence career success. attending academic conferences, psychological care, and work environment are positively related to career success. Administrators should consider ways to address these factors.

Indexed as

NursesReproductive Techniques, AssistedChinaCross-Sectional StudiesHumansJob SatisfactionSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID37194896
PMCPMC10202227

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.