ArticleRevista paulista de pediatria : orgao oficial da Sociedade de Pediatria de Sao Paulo2023
Global Assessment of Pediatric Patient Safety Tool for identifying safety incidents in pediatric patients.
Article in Revista paulista de pediatria : orgao oficial da Sociedade de Pediatria de Sao Paulo, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Harm to Children from Prescribing and Administration Errors in Acute Care: A Multidisciplinary Panel Assessment.Drug safety · 2026Article
- Establishing a trigger tool based on global trigger tools to identify adverse drug events in obstetric inpatients in China.BMC health services research · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThe aim of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of the Global Assessment of Pediatric Patient Safety (GAPPS) in order to identify patient safety incidents with patient harm or adverse events (AEs).
methodsThis is a cross-sectional, retrospective study of 240 records of hospitalized patients of both genders under 18 years of age, systematically and randomly selecting 10 charts of patients that meet the GAPPS criteria every 15 days from the 4,041 records of 2017.
resultsThe prevalence of AEs was 12.5%, i.e., detected in 30 out of 240 medical records. In total, 53 AEs and 63 harm were recorded, of which 53 (84.1%) were temporary and 43 AE (68.2%) were definitely or probably preventable. The presence of at least one trigger in a medical chart revealed 13 times greater chance of the occurrence of an AE, with sensitivity index of 48.5%, specificity of 100%, and accuracy of 86.5%.
conclusionGAPPS was effective in detecting patient safety incidents with harm or AE.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.