Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37194563›Full record

ArticleJournal of biosciences2023

Beauty in biology: An empirical assessment.

Brandon Vaidyanathan, Bailey Haraburda, Christopher Justin Jacobi

Abstract read
PubMed
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of biosciences, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Brandon VaidyanathanDepartment of Sociology, The Catholic University of America, Washington D.C., USA.
Bailey Haraburda
Christopher Justin Jacobi

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

'Beauty' is not a word typically associated with science. Nevertheless, numerous scientists in recent years have expounded on the role of beauty in science. These writings tend to be largely concentrated in theoretical physics. But what role does beauty play in the biological sciences? To answer this question, this article analyzes data from a large international study of scientists working at PhD-granting institutions in the US, UK, Italy, and India. Drawing on nationally representative surveys (N=1381) and in-depth interviews (N=104) with biologists in the sample, the article summarizes what 'beauty' means to biologists, where they encounter beauty in the practice of science, where in the scientific process they see aesthetic factors as relevant, and what they see as the consequences of encountering beauty in scientific work. The results show that most biologists in the four countries encounter beauty in the phenomena they study, and associate beauty primarily with the inner logic of systems. Most also find beauty relevant to presenting and analyzing results, and see it as a motivation for teaching as well as for pursuing scientific careers. While most biologists think it is important for scientists to encounter beauty in their work, they do not see it as always necessary or achievable.

Indexed as

BiologyIndiaItaly

Identifiers

PMID37194563

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.