Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37194472›Full record

ArticleClinical genetics2023

Increased diagnostic yield from negative whole genome-slice panels using automated reanalysis.

Seth I Berger, Georgia Pitsava, Andrea J Cohen, Emmanuèle C Délot, Jonathan LoTempio, Erin Hallie Andrew, Gloria Mas Martin, Sofia Marmolejos, Jessica Albert, Beatrix Meltzer and 8 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical genetics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Genome sequencing reveals the impact of pseudoexons in rare genetic disease.Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics · 2025
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

Seth I BergerChildren's National Rare Disease Institute, Division of Genetics and Metabolism, Washington, DC, USA.
Georgia PitsavaCenter for Genetic Medicine Research, Children's National Research Institute, Washington, DC, USA.
Andrea J CohenChildren's National Rare Disease Institute, Division of Genetics and Metabolism, Washington, DC, USA.
Emmanuèle C DélotCenter for Genetic Medicine Research, Children's National Research Institute, Washington, DC, USA.
Jonathan LoTempioCenter for Genetic Medicine Research, Children's National Research Institute, Washington, DC, USA.
Erin Hallie AndrewChildren's National Rare Disease Institute, Division of Genetics and Metabolism, Washington, DC, USA.
Gloria Mas MartinTranslational Research, Invitae Corporation, San Francisco, California, USA.
Sofia MarmolejosCenter for Genetic Medicine Research, Children's National Research Institute, Washington, DC, USA.
Jessica AlbertMolecular Diagnostics Laboratories, Children's National Hospital, Washington, DC, USA.
Beatrix MeltzerMolecular Diagnostics Laboratories, Children's National Hospital, Washington, DC, USA.
Jamie FraserChildren's National Rare Disease Institute, Division of Genetics and Metabolism, Washington, DC, USA.
Debra S RegierChildren's National Rare Disease Institute, Division of Genetics and Metabolism, Washington, DC, USA.
Amanda H Kahn-KirbyTranslational Research, Invitae Corporation, San Francisco, California, USA.
Erica SmithTranslational Research, Invitae Corporation, San Francisco, California, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5424-580X
Susan KnoblachCenter for Genetic Medicine Research, Children's National Research Institute, Washington, DC, USA.
Arthur KoCenter for Genetic Medicine Research, Children's National Research Institute, Washington, DC, USA.
Vincent A FusaroTranslational Research, Invitae Corporation, San Francisco, California, USA.
Eric VilainCenter for Genetic Medicine Research, Children's National Research Institute, Washington, DC, USA.

Funding

Pediatric Mendelian Genomics Research CenterU01HG011745 · NHGRI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA-IRVINE · PI Eric J. Vilain · 2021 to 2026
$13.3M
NHGRI NIH HHS U01 HG011745
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We evaluated the diagnostic yield using genome-slice panel reanalysis in the clinical setting using an automated phenotype/gene ranking system. We analyzed whole genome sequencing (WGS) data produced from clinically ordered panels built as bioinformatic slices for 16 clinically diverse, undiagnosed cases referred to the Pediatric Mendelian Genomics Research Center, an NHGRI-funded GREGoR Consortium site. Genome-wide reanalysis was performed using Moon™, a machine-learning-based tool for variant prioritization. In five out of 16 cases, we discovered a potentially clinically significant variant. In four of these cases, the variant was found in a gene not included in the original panel due to phenotypic expansion of a disorder or incomplete initial phenotyping of the patient. In the fifth case, the gene containing the variant was included in the original panel, but being a complex structural rearrangement with intronic breakpoints outside the clinically analyzed regions, it was not initially identified. Automated genome-wide reanalysis of clinical WGS data generated during targeted panels testing yielded a 25% increase in diagnostic findings and a possibly clinically relevant finding in one additional case, underscoring the added value of analyses versus those routinely performed in the clinical setting.

Indexed as

Computational BiologyGenomicsHumansIntronsPhenotypeWhole Genome Sequencingpanel testingwhole genome sequencing

Identifiers

PMID37194472
PMCPMC10524710

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.