ArticleBiomarker research2023
A blood-based composite panel that screens Alzheimer's disease.
Article in Biomarker research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Substituting blood-based biomarkers for imaging measures in Alzheimer's disease studies: implications for sample size and bias.The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences · 2026Article
- Substituting Blood-Based Biomarkers for Imaging Measures in Alzheimer's Disease Studies: Implications for Sample Size and Bias.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2025Article
- LRP1 at the crossroads of Aβ clearance and therapeutic targeting in Alzheimer's disease.Frontiers in aging neuroscience · 2025Review
- Development of quantitative detection methods for four Alzheimer's disease specific biomarker panels using electrochemical immunosensors based on enzyme immunoassay.Analytical sciences : the international journal of the Japan Society for Analytical Chemistry · 2024Article
- Discovery of plasma biomarkers related to blood-brain barrier dysregulation in Alzheimer's disease.Frontiers in bioinformatics · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundBlood tests would be much easier to implement in the clinical diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease (AD) as minimally invasive measurements. Multiple inspection technologies promoted AD-associated blood biomarkers' exploration. However, there was a lack of further screening and validation for these explored blood-based biomarkers. We selected four potential biomarkers to explore their plasma levels in AD and amnestic mild cognitive impairment (aMCI) and developed a composite panel for AD and aMCI screening.
methodThe plasma concentrations of soluble low-density lipoprotein receptor-associated protein 1 (sLRP1), Gelsolin (GSN), Kallikrein 4 (KLK4) and Caspase 3 were measured in the discovery and validation cohort. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was generated to assess the classification panel with the area under the curve (AUC).
resultsA total of 233 participants (26 CN, 27 aMCI, and 26 AD in the discovery cohort, and 51 CN, 50 aMCI, and 53 AD in the validation cohort) with complete data were included in the study. The plasma concentrations of sLRP1 and Caspase 3 were significantly decreased in AD and aMCI when compared with those in the CN group. Compared with the CN group, the concentrations of KLK4 and GSN were increased in AD, but not in MCI. Interestingly, one of four proteins, sLRP1 in plasma level was higher in Apolipoprotein E (APOE) ε4 non-carriers than that in APOE ε4 carriers, especially among CN and MCI. No significant difference was found between females and males in the plasma levels of four proteins. The composite panel is based on four blood biomarkers accurately classifying AD from CN (AUC = 0.903-0.928), and MCI from CN (AUC = 0.846-0.865). Moreover, dynamic changes in the plasma levels of four proteins exhibited a significant correlation with cognitive assessment.
conclusionsAltogether, these findings indicate that the plasma levels of sLRP1, KLK4, GSN and Caspase 3 changed with the progression of AD. And their combination could be used to develop a panel for classifying AD and aMCI with high accuracy, which would provide an alternative approach for developing a blood-based test for AD and aMCI screening.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.