Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37193993›Full record

ReviewCritical care (London, England)2023

The future of intensive care: the study of the microcirculation will help to guide our therapies.

J Duranteau, D De Backer, K Donadello, N I Shapiro, S D Hutchings, A Rovas, M Legrand, A Harrois, C Ince

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Critical care (London, England), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 58 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
58citing papers in PubMed
24.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

58 citing papers in PubMed, 112 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Personalised fluid therapy in septic shock.Annals of intensive care · 2026
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 9 institutions in 7 countries.

J DuranteauDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Bicêtre Hospital, Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), INSERM UMR-S 999, Paris-Saclay University, Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, France. Jacques.duranteau@aphp.fr.
D De BackerDepartment of Intensive Care, CHIREC Hospitals, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Boulevard du Triomphe 201, 1160, Brussels, Belgium.
K DonadelloAnaesthesia and Intensive Care Unit B, Department of Surgery, Dentistry, Paediatrics and Gynaecology, University of Verona, University Hospital Integrated Trust of Verona, Verona, Italy.
N I ShapiroDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center-Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
S D HutchingsKing's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
A RovasDivision of General Internal and Emergency Medicine, Nephrology, and Rheumatology, Department of Medicine D, University Hospital Münster, Albert-Schweitzer-Campus 1, 48149, Münster, Germany.
M LegrandDivision of Critical Care Medicine, Department of Anesthesia and Perioperative Care, UCSF, San Francisco, USA.
A HarroisDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Bicêtre Hospital, Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), INSERM UMR-S 999, Paris-Saclay University, Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, France.
C InceDepartment of Intensive Care, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Assistance Publique – Hôpitaux de Paris · FRBeth Israel Deaconess Medical Center · USCentre Hospitalier Interrégional Edith Cavell · BEErasmus MC · NLInserm · FRKing's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust · GBUniversity Hospital Münster · DEUniversity of California, San Francisco · USUniversity of Verona · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The goal of hemodynamic resuscitation is to optimize the microcirculation of organs to meet their oxygen and metabolic needs. Clinicians are currently blind to what is happening in the microcirculation of organs, which prevents them from achieving an additional degree of individualization of the hemodynamic resuscitation at tissue level. Indeed, clinicians never know whether optimization of the microcirculation and tissue oxygenation is actually achieved after macrovascular hemodynamic optimization. The challenge for the future is to have noninvasive, easy-to-use equipment that allows reliable assessment and immediate quantitative analysis of the microcirculation at the bedside. There are different methods for assessing the microcirculation at the bedside; all have strengths and challenges. The use of automated analysis and the future possibility of introducing artificial intelligence into analysis software could eliminate observer bias and provide guidance on microvascular-targeted treatment options. In addition, to gain caregiver confidence and support for the need to monitor the microcirculation, it is necessary to demonstrate that incorporating microcirculation analysis into the reasoning guiding hemodynamic resuscitation prevents organ dysfunction and improves the outcome of critically ill patients.

Indexed as

Critical CareMicrocirculationResuscitationArtificial IntelligenceHemodynamicsArtificial intelligenceHand-held vital microscopesHemodynamic resuscitationICUMicrocirculation

Identifiers

PMID37193993
PMCPMC10186296
OpenAlexW4376872514

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.