Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37193974›Full record

SynthesisBMC medical education2023

Digital undergraduate medical education and patient and carer involvement: a rapid systematic review of current practice.

Sadie Lawes-Wickwar, Eitan Lovat, Adedoyin Alao, Julia Hamer-Hunt, Nesrin Yurtoglu, Cherise Jensen, Nicola Clarke, Nia Roberts, Sophie Park

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMC medical education, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Sadie Lawes-WickwarDepartment of Primary Care & Population Health, University College London, London, UK. sadie.lawes-wickwar@ucl.ac.uk.
Eitan LovatDepartment of Primary Care & Population Health, University College London, London, UK.
Adedoyin AlaoSchool of Medical Education, Newcastle University Medical School, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK.
Julia Hamer-HuntDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Nesrin YurtogluDepartment of Primary Care & Population Health, University College London, London, UK.
Cherise JensenSchool of Medical Education, Newcastle University Medical School, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK.
Nicola ClarkeDepartment of Primary Care & Population Health, University College London, London, UK.
Nia RobertsBodleian Health Care Libraries, Medical Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Sophie ParkDepartment of Primary Care & Population Health, University College London, London, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundInvolving patients and carers in medical students' learning aims to centralise the perspective of healthcare users and supports our future medical workforce in the development of key skills. Medical schools are increasingly using digital technology for teaching and it is timely to understand how to maintain patient and carer involvement in this context.

methodsOvid MEDLINE, Ovid EMBASE and medRxiv were searched in October 2020 and reference lists of key articles were hand searched. Eligible studies reported authentic patient or carer involvement in undergraduate medical education where technology was also used. Study quality was assessed by the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT). Levels of patient or carer involvement were assessed using Towle et al.'s (2010) taxonomy, from Level 1 (lowest level) to Level 6 (highest level).

resultsTwenty studies were included in this systematic review. In 70% of studies, patients and carers featured in video or web-based case scenarios with no interaction between healthcare users and students. The remaining 30% of studies reported real-time interactions between students and patients via remote clinical encounters. Digital teaching sessions involving patients or carers were perceived to be valuable by students and educators, and increased student engagement, patient-centred attitudes, clinical knowledge, and communication skills. No studies reported the perspective of patients or carers. DISCUSSION: Digital technology has not yet driven higher levels of patient and carer involvement in medical training. "Live" interactions between students and patients are becoming more common but challenges need addressing to ensure positive experiences for all involved. Future teaching should enhance the role of patients and carers in medical education and support them to overcome any potential barriers to doing so remotely.

Indexed as

Education, Medical, UndergraduateStudents, MedicalCaregiversHealth PersonnelHumansLearningDigital healthcareMedical educationPatient and public involvementRemote learning

Identifiers

PMID37193974
PMCPMC10185935

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.