Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37193892›Full record

ArticleSurgical endoscopy2023

Development and validation of a preoperative difficulty scoring system for endoscopic resection of gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumor: a multi-center study.

Luojie Liu, Mei Han, Dongtao Shi, Qinghua Wang, Yunfu Feng, Fenying Lu, Rui Li, Xiaodan Xu

Open access · hybridAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Surgical endoscopy, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Luojie Liu *Department of Gastroenterology, Changshu Hospital Affiliated to Soochow University, Suzhou, China.
Mei Han *Department of Health Management Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, China.
Dongtao ShiDepartment of Gastroenterology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, China.
Qinghua WangDepartment of Gastroenterology, No. 1 People's Hospital of Kunshan, Suzhou, China.
Yunfu FengDepartment of Gastroenterology, No. 1 People's Hospital of Kunshan, Suzhou, China.
Fenying LuDepartment of Gastroenterology, No. 2 People's Hospital of Changshu, Suzhou, China.
Rui LiDepartment of Gastroenterology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, China. lrhcsz@163.com.
Xiaodan XuDepartment of Gastroenterology, Changshu Hospital Affiliated to Soochow University, Suzhou, China. Xxd20@163.com.
Soochow University · CNFirst Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University · CNChangshu No.1 People's Hospital · CNFirst People's Hospital of Kunshan · CNJiangsu University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEndoscopic resection (ER) is a promising technique for resecting gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors (gGISTs); however, ER is technically challenging. This study aimed to develop and validate a difficulty scoring system (DSS) to determine the difficulty for ER of a gGIST.

methodsThis retrospective study enrolled 555 patients with gGISTs in multi-centers from December 2010 to December 2022. Data on patients, lesions, and outcomes of ER were collected and analyzed. A difficult case was defined as an operative time ≥ 90 min, or the occurrence of severe intraoperative bleeding, or conversion to laparoscopic resection. The DSS was developed in the training cohort (TC) and validated in the internal validation cohort (IVC) and external validation cohort (EVC).

resultsThe difficulty occurred in 97 cases (17.5%). The DSS comprised the following: tumor size ≥ 3.0 cm (3 points) or 2.0-3.0 cm (1 point); location in the upper third of the stomach (2 points); invasion depth beyond the muscularis propria (2 points); lack of experience (1 point). The area under the curve (AUC) of DSS in IVC and EVC was 0.838 and 0.864, respectively, and the negative predictive value (NPV) was 0.923 and 0.972, respectively. The proportions of difficult operation in easy (score 0-3), intermediate (score 4-5), and difficult (score 6-8) categories were 6.5%, 29.4%, and 88.2% in the TC, 7.7%, 45.8%, and 85.7% in the IVC, and 7.0%, 29.4%, and 85.7% in the EVC, respectively.

conclusionsWe developed and validated a preoperative DSS for ER of gGISTs based on tumor size, location, invasion depth, and endoscopists' experience. This DSS can be used to grade the technical difficulty before surgery.

Indexed as

Gastrointestinal Stromal TumorsLaparoscopyStomach NeoplasmsHumansRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeDifficulty scoring systemEndoscopic resectionGastrointestinal stromal tumors

Identifiers

PMID37193892
PMCPMC10338596
OpenAlexW4376871687

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.