Trial reportProstate cancer and prostatic diseases2023
ExoDx prostate test as a predictor of outcomes of high-grade prostate cancer - an interim analysis.
Trial report in Prostate cancer and prostatic diseases, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. It is linked to trial NCT03235687 (A Prospective, Randomized Blinded, Shared Decision Impact Trial of the ExoDx Prostate), which is not on this map. Cited by 42 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Prospective, Randomized Blinded, Shared Decision Impact Trial of the ExoDx Prostate (IntelliScore), EPI Test, in Men Presenting for Initial Biopsy.
Who cites it
42 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Exosomal Liquid Biopsy in Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review of Biomarkers for Diagnosis, Prognosis, and Treatment Response.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Pooled it
- Present status of prostate cancer diagnosis, limitations, challenges, and future endeavors.Annals of medicine · 2026Review
- Early-Onset Prostate Cancer: Epidemiology, Risk Factors, Biology, Clinical Features, Management, and Early Detection.MedComm · 2026Review
- Extracellular vesicles in solid tumors: from tumor ecology to engineered therapeutics.Molecular cancer · 2026Review
- Diagnosis of Prostate Cancer: A Comparative Evaluation of Biological Techniques.Diseases (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- A rapid urinary test for combining PSA and zinc to enhance prostate cancer diagnosis: results from a prospective study.Prostate cancer and prostatic diseases · 2026Article
- Liquid Biopsy in Advanced Prostate Cancer.Cancers · 2026Review
- Early-stage multi-cancer detection through a plasma extracellular vesicle protein signature.Cell reports. Medicine · 2026Article
- From prostate specific antigen to genomic signatures: Advances in biomarkers for prostate cancer diagnosis and prognosis.Translational oncology · 2026Review
- Leveraging extracellular vesicle biology for novel tests and therapeutics for kidney fibrosis.Clinical and translational medicine · 2026Review
- Utility of the PROSTest, a Novel Blood-Based Molecular Assay, Versus PSA for Prostate Cancer Stratification and Detection of Disease.The Prostate · 2026Article
- Multimodal urinary biomarker panel achieves superior prostate cancer detection accuracy and reduces unnecessary biopsies.Translational oncology · 2026Article
- Metabolomics of Prostate Cancer and Clinical Profiles Following Radiotherapy: Need for a Precision Phylometabolomics Approach.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Extracellular Vesicles and the Gartner Hype Cycle.Journal of extracellular biology · 2025Article
- Clinical relevance of extracellular vesicles in cancer - therapeutic and diagnostic potential.Nature reviews. Clinical oncology · 2025Review
- Tumor Extracellular Vesicle Digital Scoring Assays for Cancer Detection and Monitoring.Precision chemistry · 2025Review
- Integration of label-free surface enhanced Raman spectroscopy (SERS) of extracellular vesicles (EVs) with Raman tagged labels to enhance ovarian cancer diagnostics.Biosensors & bioelectronics · 2025Article
- Exosomes in Clinical Laboratory: From Biomarker Discovery to Diagnostic Implementation.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2025Review
- Bio fluid exosomes: promises, challenges, and future directions in translational medicine.Journal of translational medicine · 2025Review
- From bench to bedside: the evolution and future of prostate-specific antigen testing.Medical oncology (Northwood, London, England) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPatient outcomes were assessed based on a pre-biopsy ExoDx Prostate (EPI) score at 2.5 years of the 5-year follow-up of ongoing prostate biopsy Decision Impact Trial of the ExoDx Prostate (IntelliScore).
methodsProspective, blinded, randomized, multisite clinical utility study was conducted from June 2017 to May 2018 (NCT03235687). Urine samples were collected from 1049 men (≥50 years old) with a PSA 2-10 ng/mL being considered for a prostate biopsy. Patients were randomized to EPI vs. standard of care (SOC). All had an EPI test, but only EPI arm received results during biopsy decision process. Clinical outcomes, time to biopsy and pathology were assessed among low (<15.6) or high (≥15.6) EPI scores.
resultsAt 2.5 years, 833 patients had follow-up data. In the EPI arm, biopsy rates remained lower for low-risk EPI scores than high-risk EPI scores (44.6% vs 79.0%, p < 0.001), whereas biopsy rates were identical in SOC arm regardless of EPI score (59.6% vs 58.8%, p = 0.99). Also in the EPI arm, the average time from EPI testing to first biopsy was longer for low-risk EPI scores compared to high-risk EPI scores (216 vs. 69 days; p < 0.001). Similarly, the time to first biopsy was longer with EPI low-risk scores in EPI arm compared to EPI low-risk scores in SOC arm (216 vs 80 days; p < 0.001). At 2.5 years, patients with low-risk EPI scores from both arms had less HGPC than high-risk EPI score patients (7.9% vs 26.8%, p < 0.001) and the EPI arm found 21.8% more HGPC than the SOC arm.
conclusionsThis follow-up analysis captures subsequent biopsy outcomes and demonstrates that men receiving EPI low-risk scores (<15.6) significantly defer the time to first biopsy and remain at a very low pathologic risk by 2.5-years after the initial study. The EPI test risk stratification identified low-risk patients that were not found with the SOC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.