Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37193776›Full record

Trial reportProstate cancer and prostatic diseases2023

ExoDx prostate test as a predictor of outcomes of high-grade prostate cancer - an interim analysis.

Ronald Tutrone, Ben Lowentritt, Brian Neuman, Michael J Donovan, Elliot Hallmark, T Jeffrey Cole, Yiyuan Yao, Claire Biesecker, Sonia Kumar, Vinita Verma and 3 more

Erratum issued Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Prostate cancer and prostatic diseases, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. It is linked to trial NCT03235687 (A Prospective, Randomized Blinded, Shared Decision Impact Trial of the ExoDx Prostate), which is not on this map. Cited by 42 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
42citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03235687 naunknown statusnot on this map

A Prospective, Randomized Blinded, Shared Decision Impact Trial of the ExoDx Prostate (IntelliScore), EPI Test, in Men Presenting for Initial Biopsy.

TypeinterventionalSponsorExosome Diagnostics, Inc.Ran2017 to 2023Enrolled1,000ConditionsCancer of the ProstateArmsExoDx Prostate (IntelliScore)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

42 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Extracellular Vesicles and the Gartner Hype Cycle.Journal of extracellular biology · 2025
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Ronald TutroneChesapeake Urology Research Associates, Baltimore, MD, USA. rtutrone@uniteduro.com.ORCID 0000-0001-6705-778X
Ben LowentrittChesapeake Urology Research Associates, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Brian NeumanChesapeake Urology Research Associates, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Michael J DonovanIcahn School of Medicine at Mt. Sinai, New York City, NY, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0772-598X
Elliot HallmarkExosome Diagnostics, a Bio-Techne Brand, Waltham, MA, USA.
T Jeffrey ColeExosome Diagnostics, a Bio-Techne Brand, Waltham, MA, USA.
Yiyuan YaoExosome Diagnostics, a Bio-Techne Brand, Waltham, MA, USA.
Claire BieseckerChesapeake Urology Research Associates, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Sonia KumarExosome Diagnostics, a Bio-Techne Brand, Waltham, MA, USA.
Vinita VermaExosome Diagnostics, a Bio-Techne Brand, Waltham, MA, USA.
Grannum R SantExosome Diagnostics, a Bio-Techne Brand, Waltham, MA, USA.
Jason AlterExosome Diagnostics, a Bio-Techne Brand, Waltham, MA, USA.
Johan SkogExosome Diagnostics, a Bio-Techne Brand, Waltham, MA, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPatient outcomes were assessed based on a pre-biopsy ExoDx Prostate (EPI) score at 2.5 years of the 5-year follow-up of ongoing prostate biopsy Decision Impact Trial of the ExoDx Prostate (IntelliScore).

methodsProspective, blinded, randomized, multisite clinical utility study was conducted from June 2017 to May 2018 (NCT03235687). Urine samples were collected from 1049 men (≥50 years old) with a PSA 2-10 ng/mL being considered for a prostate biopsy. Patients were randomized to EPI vs. standard of care (SOC). All had an EPI test, but only EPI arm received results during biopsy decision process. Clinical outcomes, time to biopsy and pathology were assessed among low (<15.6) or high (≥15.6) EPI scores.

resultsAt 2.5 years, 833 patients had follow-up data. In the EPI arm, biopsy rates remained lower for low-risk EPI scores than high-risk EPI scores (44.6% vs 79.0%, p < 0.001), whereas biopsy rates were identical in SOC arm regardless of EPI score (59.6% vs 58.8%, p = 0.99). Also in the EPI arm, the average time from EPI testing to first biopsy was longer for low-risk EPI scores compared to high-risk EPI scores (216 vs. 69 days; p < 0.001). Similarly, the time to first biopsy was longer with EPI low-risk scores in EPI arm compared to EPI low-risk scores in SOC arm (216 vs 80 days; p < 0.001). At 2.5 years, patients with low-risk EPI scores from both arms had less HGPC than high-risk EPI score patients (7.9% vs 26.8%, p < 0.001) and the EPI arm found 21.8% more HGPC than the SOC arm.

conclusionsThis follow-up analysis captures subsequent biopsy outcomes and demonstrates that men receiving EPI low-risk scores (<15.6) significantly defer the time to first biopsy and remain at a very low pathologic risk by 2.5-years after the initial study. The EPI test risk stratification identified low-risk patients that were not found with the SOC.

Indexed as

ProstateProstatic NeoplasmsBiopsyHumansMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesProstate-Specific AntigenProstate-Specific Antigen

Identifiers

PMID37193776
PMCPMC10449627

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.