SynthesisInternational wound journal2023
Effect of single-port video-assisted thoracoscopy on surgical site wound infection and healing in patients with lung cancer: A meta-analysis.
Synthesis in International wound journal, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It has been retracted, and should not be counted. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Effect of single-port video-assisted thoracoscopy on surgical site wound infection and healing in patients with lung cancer: A meta-analysis.International wound journal · 2023Pooled it
- Single-port EDGE SP1000 versus multi-port Da Vinci Xi robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a comparative analysis of technique and perioperative outcomes.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Article
- RETRACTION: Effect of Single-Port Video-Assisted Thoracoscopy on Surgical Site Wound Infection and Healing in Patients With Lung Cancer: A Meta-Analysis.International wound journal · 2025Article
- Evolution of uniportal video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery: optimization and advancements.Journal of thoracic disease · 2024Article
- RETRACTED: Effects of thoracoscopic lobectomy on surgical wound infection in patients with lung cancer: A meta-analysis.International wound journal · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
- Retraction · 2025-03-06Compromised Peer Review · Investigation by Journal/Publisher ·
- Retracted
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
We performed a meta-analysis to comprehensively assess the effect of single-port video-assisted thoracoscopy on surgical site wound infection and healing in patients with lung cancer. A computerised search for studies on single-port video-assisted thoracoscopy treatment of lung cancer was conducted from the time of database creation through February 2023 using the PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, and Wanfang databases. Two investigators independently screened the literature, extracted information, and evaluated the quality of studies according to inclusion and exclusion criteria. Either a fixed or random-effects model was used in calculating the relative risk (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.4 software. The results showed that, compared with multi-port video-assisted thoracoscopy, single-port video-assisted thoracoscopy significantly reduced surgical site wound infection (RR: 0.38, 95% CI: 0.19-0.77, P = .007) and significantly promoted wound healing (RR: 0.37, 95% CI: 0.22-0.64, P < .001). Compared with multi-port video-assisted thoracoscopy, single-port video-assisted thoracoscopy significantly reduced surgical site wound infections and also promoted wound healing. However, because of large variations in study sample sizes, some of the literature reported methods of inferior quality. Additional high-quality studies containing large sample sizes are needed to further validate these results.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.