ArticleMedical journal, Armed Forces India
Utility of multiplex real-time PCR for diagnosing paediatric acute respiratory tract infection in a tertiary care hospital.
Article in Medical journal, Armed Forces India. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Acute respiratory infections (ARIs) are responsible for considerable morbidity and mortality among children all over the world. Many of the etiologic agents of the infections especially viral go undiagnosed for lack of requisite facility and the cost factors. We have used a commercially available platform for diagnosis of ARIs in children receiving inpatient and outpatient services in a tertiary care centre. Methods: The framework of the study was prospective and observational. In this study, clinical samples of children suffering from ARIs were subjected to real-time multiplex PCR targeting both viral and bacterial pathogens. Results: Of 94 samples received at our centre (49 male and 45 female), the positivity for respiratory pathogens was detected in 50 (53.19%) samples. Clinical symptoms of patients and age distribution have been elaborated in text. A single pathogen (n = 29/50), two pathogens (15/50) and three pathogens (n = 6/50) were detected by multiplex RT-PCR. Of 77 isolates detected, maximum numbers were of human rhinovirus (HRV) (n = 14) (18.18%) Conclusion: The epidemiology of ARIs considering viral etiologies is poorly understood due to less number of studies especially in Indian subcontinent. The advent of latest advanced molecular methods has made it possible to identify common respiratory pathogens and has contributed to cover the gap in existing knowledge.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.