Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37193429›Full record

ReviewCureus2023

Virtual and Augmented Reality in Post-stroke Rehabilitation: A Narrative Review.

Rhutuja Khokale, Grace S Mathew, Somi Ahmed, Sara Maheen, Moiz Fawad, Prabhudas Bandaru, Annu Zerin, Zahra Nazir, Imran Khawaja, Imtenan Sharif and 2 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Metaverse-Related and Immersive Digital Technologies in Neurorehabilitation: A Scoping Review.Archives of rehabilitation research and clinical translation · 2026
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Rhutuja KhokaleNeurology, California Institute of Behavioral Neurosciences & Psychology LLC, Fairfield, USA.
Grace S MathewMedicine, Medical University of Varna, Varna, BGR.
Somi AhmedIntensive Care Unit, Sumeru City Hospital, Lalitpur, NPL.
Sara MaheenGeneral Medicine, Odessa National Medical University, Odessa, UKR.
Moiz FawadNeurological Surgery, King Saud Medical City, Riyadh, SAU.
Prabhudas BandaruMedicine, Kakatiya Medical College, Warangal, IND.
Annu ZerinInternal Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhubaneswar, Bhubaneswar, IND.
Zahra NazirInternal Medicine, Combined Military Hospital, Quetta, PAK.
Imran KhawajaInternal Medicine, Ayub Medical Institute, Abottabad, PAK.
Imtenan SharifCommunity Medicine, Quetta Institute of Medical Sciences, Quetta, PAK.
Zain U AbdinMedicine, District Head Quarter Hospital, Faisalabad, PAK.
Anum AkbarPediatrics, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Virtual reality (VR) and augmented reality (AR) are noble adjunctive technologies currently being studied for the neuro-rehabilitation of post-stroke patients, potentially enhancing conventional therapy. We explored the literature to find if VR/AR improves neuroplasticity in stroke rehabilitation for a better quality of life. This modality can lay the foundation for telerehabilitation services in remote areas. We analyzed four databases, namely Cochrane Library, PubMed, Google Scholar, and Science Direct, by searching the following keywords: ("Stroke Rehabilitation" [Majr]) AND ("Augmented Reality" [Majr]), Virtual Augmented Reality in Stroke Rehabilitation. All the available open articles were reviewed and outlined. The studies conclude that VR/AR can help in early rehabilitation and yield better results in post-stroke patients in adjunct to conventional therapy. However, due to the limited research on this subject, we cannot conclude that this information is absolute. Moreover, VR/AR was seldom customized according to the needs of stroke survivors, which would have given us the full extent of its application. Around the world, stroke survivors are being studied to verify the accessibility and practicality of these innovative technologies. Observations conclude that further exploration of the extent of the implementations and efficacy of VR and AR, combined with conventional rehabilitation, is fundamental.

Indexed as

augmented reality (ar)rehabilitationstrokevarvirtual reality (vr)

Identifiers

PMID37193429
PMCPMC10183111

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.