Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37193365›Full record

ArticleJournal of biomedical optics2023

Monitoring the skin structure during edema

Denis A Davydov, Gleb S Budylin, Alexey V Baev, Daniil V Vaypan, Elena M Seredenina, Simon T Matskeplishvili, Stanislav A Evlashin, Armais A Kamalov, Evgeny A Shirshin

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of biomedical optics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Denis A DavydovLomonosov Moscow State University, Faculty of Physics, Moscow, Russia.ORCID 0000-0001-6757-5130
Gleb S BudylinFirst Moscow State Medical University, Biomedical Science and Technology Park, Laboratory of Clinical Biophotonics, Moscow, Russia.ORCID 0000-0002-6760-8905
Alexey V BaevLomonosov Moscow State University, Faculty of Physics, Moscow, Russia.
Daniil V VaypanMoscow State University, Medical Research and Education Center, Moscow, Russia.
Elena M SeredeninaMoscow State University, Medical Research and Education Center, Moscow, Russia.
Simon T MatskeplishviliMoscow State University, Medical Research and Education Center, Moscow, Russia.ORCID 0000-0002-5670-167X
Stanislav A EvlashinSkolkovo Institute of Science and Technology, Center for Materials Technologies, Moscow, Russia.
Armais A KamalovMoscow State University, Medical Research and Education Center, Moscow, Russia.
Evgeny A ShirshinLomonosov Moscow State University, Faculty of Physics, Moscow, Russia.
Lomonosov Moscow State University · RUSechenov University · RUInstitute of Spectroscopy · RUSkolkovo Institute of Science and Technology · RU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Significance: Edema occurs in the course of various skin diseases. It manifests itself in changes in water concentrations in skin layers: dermis and hypodermis and their thicknesses. In medicine and cosmetology, objective tools are required to assess the skin's physiological parameters. The dynamics of edema and the skin of healthy volunteers were studied using spatially resolved diffuse reflectance spectroscopy (DRS) in conjunction with ultrasound (US). Aim: In this work, we have developed a method based on DRS with a spatial resolution (SR DRS), allowing us to simultaneously assess water content in the dermis, dermal thickness, and hypodermal thickness. Approach: An experimental investigation of histamine included edema using SR DRS under the control of US was conducted. An approach for skin parameter determination was studied and confirmed using Monte-Carlo simulation of diffuse reflectance spectra for a three-layered system with the varying dermis and hypodermis parameters. Results: It was shown that an interfiber distance of 1 mm yields a minimal relative error of water content determination in the dermis equal to 9.3%. The lowest error of hypodermal thickness estimation was achieved with the interfiber distance of 10 mm. Dermal thickness for a group of volunteers (7 participants, 21 measurement sites) was determined using SR DRS technique with an 8.3% error using machine learning approaches, taking measurements at multiple interfiber distances into account. Hypodermis thickness was determined with root mean squared error of 0.56 mm for the same group. Conclusions: This study demonstrates that measurement of the skin diffuse reflectance response at multiple distances makes it possible to determine the main parameters of the skin and will serve as the basis for the development and verification of an approach that works in a wide range of skin structure parameters.

Indexed as

EdemaSkinComputer SimulationHumansMonte Carlo MethodSpectrum Analysiscutaneous edemadermal thicknesshypodermal thicknessspatially resolved diffuse reflectance spectroscopywater in the skin

Identifiers

PMID37193365
PMCPMC10182858
OpenAlexW4376321190

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.