Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37193257›Full record

ArticleRegenerative engineering and translational medicine2023

3D Printing of Hybrid-Hydrogel Materials for Tissue Engineering: a Critical Review.

Sanaz Tajik, Camila Negron Garcia, Samantha Gillooley, Lobat Tayebi

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Regenerative engineering and translational medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Polyethersulfone Polymer for Biomedical Applications and Biotechnology.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sanaz TajikMarquette University School of Dentistry, Milwaukee, WI, 53233, USA.
Camila Negron GarciaMarquette University School of Dentistry, Milwaukee, WI, 53233, USA.
Samantha GillooleyMarquette University School of Dentistry, Milwaukee, WI, 53233, USA.
Lobat TayebiMarquette University School of Dentistry, Milwaukee, WI, 53233, USA.
Marquette University · US

Funding

Supplement: Development of an Integrated 3D Human Osteo-Mucosal ModelR15DE027533 · NIDCR · MARQUETTE UNIVERSITY · PI TAYEBI, LOBAT · 2018 to 2021
$816k
Vascularization of critical-sized craniomaxillofacial defectsR56DE029191 · NIDCR · MARQUETTE UNIVERSITY · PI TAYEBI, LOBAT · 2021 to 2021
$363k
NIDCR NIH HHS R15 DE027533NIDCR NIH HHS R56 DE029191
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: Key natural polymers, known as hydrogels, are an important group of materials in design of tissue-engineered constructs that can provide suitable habitat for cell attachment and proliferation. However, in comparison to tissues within the body, these hydrogels display poor mechanical properties. Such properties cause challenges in 3D printing of hydrogel scaffolds as well as their surgical handling after fabrication. For this reason, the purpose of this study is to critically review the 3D printing processes of hydrogels and their characteristics for tissue engineering application. Methods: A search of Google Scholar and PubMed has been performed from 2003 to February 2022 using a combination of keywords. A review of the types of 3D printing is presented. Additionally, different types of hydrogels and nano-biocomposite materials for 3D printing application are critically reviewed. The rheological properties and crosslinking mechanisms for the hydrogels are assessed. Results: Extrusion-based 3D printing is the most common practice for constructing hydrogel-based scaffolds, and it allows for the use of varying types of polymers to enhance the properties and printability of the hydrogel-based scaffolds. Rheology has been found to be exceedingly important in the 3D printing process; however, shear-thinning and thixotropic characteristics should also be present in the hydrogel. Despite these features of extrusion-based 3D printing, there are limitations to its printing resolution and scale. Conclusion: Combining natural and synthetic polymers and a variety of nanomaterials, such as metal, metal oxide, non-metal, and polymeric, can enhance the properties of hydrogel and provide additional functionality to their 3D-printed constructs.

Indexed as

3D PrintingHybrid-Hydrogel MaterialsHydrogel 3D PrintingHydrogel ScaffoldTissue Engineering

Identifiers

PMID37193257
PMCPMC10181842
OpenAlexW4289262115

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.