ArticleRegenerative engineering and translational medicine2023
3D Printing of Hybrid-Hydrogel Materials for Tissue Engineering: a Critical Review.
Article in Regenerative engineering and translational medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 35 citations in OpenAlex.
- Multifunctional implantable hydrogels: Smart platforms at the forefront of biomedical innovation.Materials today. Bio · 2026Review
- Extracellular matrix-mimetic ink for 3D printing and minimally invasive delivery of shape-memory constructs.Materials today. Bio · 2026Article
- Cutting-Edge Smart Hydrogel Platforms for Improved Wound Healing.Pharmaceutics · 2026Review
- Formulation and 3D Printing of Collagen/Chitosan Inks: Tailoring the Scaffold Properties.Gels (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Innovative prospects in 3D printed bio-scaffolds for osteochondral tissue engineering: A systematic review.World journal of methodology · 2026Article
- Injectable Nanocomposite Biomaterial for 3D Printing of Personalized Matrices and Their Use in Bioreactors for Bioengineering Advanced Cell Culture Models.ACS applied materials & interfaces · 2025Article
- Article
- Enhancing auricular reconstruction: A biomimetic scaffold with 3D-printed multiscale porous structure utilizing chondrogenic activity ink.Materials today. Bio · 2025Article
- Engineering extracellular matrix-based hydrogels for intervertebral disc regeneration.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2025Review
- Hydrogel-Based Biomaterials in Spinal Repair: Evaluating Mechanisms for IVDD, SCI, and Dural Regeneration.Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare · 2025Review
- Micro-thin hydrogel coating integrated in 3D printing for spatiotemporal delivery of bioactive small molecules.Biofabrication · 2024Article
- Polyethersulfone Polymer for Biomedical Applications and Biotechnology.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Review
- 3D-Printed Hydrogel for Diverse Applications: A Review.Gels (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Article
- Essential Guide to Hydrogel Rheology in Extrusion 3D Printing: How to Measure It and Why It Matters?Gels (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Optimizing GBM organoid construction with hydrogel-based models: GelMA-HAMA scaffold supports GBM organoids with clonal growth for drug screening.Cell transplantationArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Purpose: Key natural polymers, known as hydrogels, are an important group of materials in design of tissue-engineered constructs that can provide suitable habitat for cell attachment and proliferation. However, in comparison to tissues within the body, these hydrogels display poor mechanical properties. Such properties cause challenges in 3D printing of hydrogel scaffolds as well as their surgical handling after fabrication. For this reason, the purpose of this study is to critically review the 3D printing processes of hydrogels and their characteristics for tissue engineering application. Methods: A search of Google Scholar and PubMed has been performed from 2003 to February 2022 using a combination of keywords. A review of the types of 3D printing is presented. Additionally, different types of hydrogels and nano-biocomposite materials for 3D printing application are critically reviewed. The rheological properties and crosslinking mechanisms for the hydrogels are assessed. Results: Extrusion-based 3D printing is the most common practice for constructing hydrogel-based scaffolds, and it allows for the use of varying types of polymers to enhance the properties and printability of the hydrogel-based scaffolds. Rheology has been found to be exceedingly important in the 3D printing process; however, shear-thinning and thixotropic characteristics should also be present in the hydrogel. Despite these features of extrusion-based 3D printing, there are limitations to its printing resolution and scale. Conclusion: Combining natural and synthetic polymers and a variety of nanomaterials, such as metal, metal oxide, non-metal, and polymeric, can enhance the properties of hydrogel and provide additional functionality to their 3D-printed constructs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.