ArticleAmerican journal of translational research2023
Folate receptor-positive circulating tumor cells in predicting ground-glass nodules malignancy.
Article in American journal of translational research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Value of circulating tumor cell assisting low-dose computed tomography in screening pulmonary nodules based on existing liquid biopsy techniques: a systematic review with meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2024Pooled it
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo study the clinical significance of folate receptor-positive circulating tumor cells (FR+CTCs) in determining malignancy of ground-glass nodules (GGNs) and assess the added value of FR+CTC in the classic GGN evaluation model (Mayo Model).
methodsSixty-five patients with single indeterminate GGN were recruited. Twenty-two participants had benign/pre-malignant diseases, and forty-three had lung cancers, as confirmed by histopathology examination. FR+CTC was enumerated by CytoploRare
resultsIn the cohort, the mean age of 13 males and 9 females with benign/pre-malignant diseases was 57.7 ± 10.2 years. The mean age of 13 males and 30 females with lung cancers was 53.8 ± 11.7 years. There was no significant difference between the age and the smoking history (P=0.196 and P=0.847, respectively). FR+CTC can effectively differentiate lung cancer from benign/pre-malignant diseases [sensitivity: 88.4%, specificity: 81.8%, the AUCs was 0.8975, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.8174-0.9775] in patients with GGN. Multivariate analysis revealed that FR+CTC level, tumor size, and tumor location were independent predictors of GGN malignancy (P<0.05). The prediction model based on these factors showed better diagnostic efficiency than the Mayo model (AUC: 0.9345 vs. 0.6823), yielding superior sensitivity (81.4% vs. 53.5%) and specificity (95.5% vs. 86.4%).
conclusionThe FR+CTC exhibited a promising potential in determining the malignancy of indeterminate GGNs, and the CTC model's diagnostic efficiency was superior to the Mayo model.
Indexed as
Identifiers
37193191PMC10182480W4376871825What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.