ArticleAmerican journal of translational research2023
Distal transradial access decreases radial artery occlusion rate in percutaneous coronary interventions.
Article in American journal of translational research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Distal versus proximal radial access in coronary angiography: a meta-analysis.Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society · 2026Pooled it
- Feasibility and safety of transarterial chemoembolization in patients with liver cancer via the distal radial approach: a single-center retrospective cohort study.Translational cancer research · 2024Article
- Application of the radial artery after angiography in patients undergoing total arterial coronary revascularization.Journal of cardiothoracic surgery · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundTo investigate the incidence of complications such as radial artery occlusion (RAO) after distal or conventional transradial access in percutaneous coronary interventions, and to compare the advantages and disadvantages of those two approaches.
methodsIn this retrospective study, the data of 110 patients received either distal transradial access (dTRA) (n=56 cases) or conventional transradial access (cTRA) (n=54 cases) in percutaneous coronary interventions were analyzed to compare the incidence of RAO.
resultsThe incidence of RAO in the dTRA group significantly decreased compared with that in the cTRA group (P<0.05). Univariate analysis indicated that smoking (r=0.064, P=0.011), dTRA (r=0.431, P<0.001), cTRA (r=0.088, P=0.015), radial artery spasm (r=-0.021, P=0.016), and postoperative arterial compression time (r=0.081, P<0.001) were exposure factors for the incidence of RAO. In multivariable analysis, independent risk factors for RAO were postoperative arterial compression time (P=0.038) and dTRA (P<0.001).
conclusionsdTRA shortened the postoperative arterial compression time and decreased the incidence of RAO compared with conventional transradial approach.
Indexed as
Identifiers
37193144PMC10182503What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.