Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37193125›Full record

ArticleResearch and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis2023

Hormone exposure and venous thromboembolism in commercially insured women aged 50 to 64 years.

Susan C Weller, John W Davis, Laura Porterfield, Lu Chen, Gregg Wilkinson

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Research and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Gender-affirming hormone therapy in the transgender patient: influence on thrombotic risk.Hematology. American Society of Hematology. Education Program · 2024
    Review
  6. Article
  7. The crux of menopausal hormone therapy: dose, route, and age.Research and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Susan C WellerDepartment of Population Health Science, School of Public and Population Health, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, Texas, USA.
John W DavisDepartment of Population Health Science, School of Public and Population Health, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, Texas, USA.
Laura PorterfieldSealy Institute for Vaccine Sciences, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, Texas, USA.
Lu ChenDepartment of Population Health Science, School of Public and Population Health, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, Texas, USA.
Gregg WilkinsonDepartment of Population Health Science, School of Public and Population Health, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, Texas, USA.
The University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Menopausal hormone therapy (MHT) can elevate venous thromboembolism (VTE) risk, but less is known about formulations and routes of exposures. Objective: To estimate hormone-associated VTE risk by route and formulation in exposed and unexposed women aged 50 to 64 years in the US. Methods: In a nested case-control study of US commercially insured women aged 50 to 64 years (2007-2019), cases were defined as incident VTE diagnoses and matched to 10 controls by date of VTE and age, excluding prior VTE, inferior vena cava filter placement, or anticoagulants. Filled prescriptions in the prior year defined hormone exposures. Results: Odds ratios (ORs) were estimated with conditional logistic regression controlling for differences between cases (n = 20,359) and controls (n = 203,590) in comorbidities and VTE risk factors. For exposures within 60 days, oral MHT risk was almost twice as high as transdermal MHT (OR = 1.92; 95% CI, 1.43-2.60); transdermal MHT did not elevate risk compared with no exposure (unopposed OR = 0.70; 95% CI, 0.59-0.83; combined OR = 0.73; 95% CI, 0.56-0.96). Risk was highest for MHT combinations with ethinyl estradiol, followed by conjugated equine estrogen (CEE) (ethinyl estradiol-CEE: OR = 1.55; 95% CI, 1.07-2.25), and lowest for estradiol (CEE-estradiol: OR = 1.33; 95% CI, 1.02-1.72). Combined hormonal contraceptives elevated risk 5 times higher than no exposure (OR = 5.22; 95% CI, 4.67-5.84) and 3 times higher than oral MHT (OR = 3.65; 95% CI, 3.09-4.31). Conclusion: The risk of VTE is much lower with MHT than combined hormone contraceptives and varies by hormone formulation and route of exposure. Transdermal MHT did not elevate risk. Oral MHT combinations with estradiol were lower risk than other forms of estrogen. Oral combined hormone contraceptives had much higher risk than oral combined hormonal MHT.

Indexed as

contraceptivesestrogensfemalemenopauseprogesteroneprogestinvenous thromboembolism

Identifiers

PMID37193125
PMCPMC10182313
OpenAlexW4360999451

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.