Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37193089›Full record

ArticlePerspectives of the ASHA special interest groups2023

What predicts individual response to language treatment in bilingual children with developmental language disorder?

Kerry Danahy Ebert, Giang T Pham

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Perspectives of the ASHA special interest groups, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Kerry Danahy EbertDepartment of Speech-Language-Hearing Sciences, University of Minnesota-Twin Cities, Minneapolis, MN.ORCID 0000-0002-7607-9742
Giang T PhamSchool of Speech, Language, and Hearing Sciences, San Diego State University, San Diego, CA.ORCID 0000-0001-5895-0365
Google (United States) · US

Funding

Nonlinguistic cognitive processing commonalities among linguistically diverse learners with developmental language disorderR01DC019613 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI EBERT, KERRY DANAHY · 2021 to 2025
$1.9M
Three Treatments for Bilingual Children with Language ImpairmentR21DC010868 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI KOHNERT, KATHRYN J · 2010 to 2011
$451k
NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC019613NIDCD NIH HHS R21 DC010868
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: For bilingual children with developmental language disorder (DLD), language treatment response is the degree to which an individual child progresses in both of their languages. Understanding what predicts language treatment response for an individual child can help clinicians plan treatment more effectively. Methods: This study is a retrospective analysis of data from Ebert et al. (2014). Participants included 32 school-age Spanish-English bilingual children with DLD who completed an intensive language treatment program. Gains in Spanish and English were measured using raw test scores in each language. Predictors of language gains include language, cognitive, and demographic variables. To examine which predictors were significant, we calculated partial correlations between the potential predictors and the posttreatment language test scores, controlling for the effects of pretreatment test scores. Results: In Spanish, several predictors correlated with the outcome measures. After controlling for pretreatment scores, English grammaticality, female sex, processing speed, age, and fluid reasoning were related to Spanish posttreatment scores. In English, correlations with individual predictors were minimal. After controlling for pretreatment scores, only one variable was associated with one English posttreatment score: English grammaticality. Conclusions: The original study reported limited gains in Spanish compared to robust gains in English (Ebert et al., 2014). Treatment response in Spanish is more variable given the lack of environmental support for Spanish in the US. As a result, individual factors (including nonverbal cognition, pretreatment language levels, and demographic variables) influence treatment gains in Spanish. In contrast, strong environmental support for English supports a more consistent treatment response, with a smaller role for individual factors.

Identifiers

PMID37193089
PMCPMC10171084
OpenAlexW4319342151

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.