ArticleJAC-antimicrobial resistance2023
A comparison of phenotypic and WGS drug susceptibility testing in
Article in JAC-antimicrobial resistance, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Whole genome sequencing-based detection of extensively drug-resistant tuberculosis from Ethiopia.Communications medicine · 2025Article
- Clinical best practices for caring for people with expanded resistance to newer TB drugs.IJTLD open · 2025Review
- Diagnostic yield of nine user-friendly bioinformatics tools for predicting Mycobacterium tuberculosis drug resistance: A systematic review and network meta-analysis.PLOS global public health · 2025Article
- Discrepancies in tuberculosis burden estimates: North Korean defectors vs. official reports.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Background: WGS has significant potential to help tackle the major public health problem of TB. The Republic of Korea has the third highest rates of TB of all Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development countries but there has been very limited use of WGS in TB to date. Objectives: A retrospective comparison of Methods: Fifty-seven MTB isolates had DNA extracted and were sequenced using the Illumina HiSeq platform. The WGS analysis was performed using bwa mem, bcftools and IQ-Tree; resistance markers were identified using TB profiler. Phenotypic susceptibilities were carried out at the Supranational TB reference laboratory (Korean Institute of Tuberculosis). Results: For first-line antituberculous drugs concordance for rifampicin, isoniazid, pyrazinamide and ethambutol was 98.25%, 92.98%, 87.72% and 85.96%, respectively. The sensitivity of WGS-DSP compared with pDST for rifampicin, isoniazid, pyrazinamide and ethambutol was 97.30%, 92.11%, 78.95% and 95.65%, respectively. The specificity for these first-line antituberculous drugs was 100%, 94.74%, 92.11% and 79.41%, respectively. The sensitivity and specificity for second-line drugs ranged from 66.67% to 100%, and from 82.98% to 100%, respectively. Conclusions: This study confirms the potential role for WGS in drug susceptibility prediction, which would reduce turnaround times. However, further larger studies are needed to ensure current databases of drug resistance mutations are reflective of the TB present in the Republic of Korea.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.