Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37192790›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2023

Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on people in need of care or support: protocol for a SARS-CoV-2 registry.

Jochen Gensichen, Isabel Zöllinger, Ildiko Gagyor, Anita Hausen, Michael Hölscher, Christian Janke, Thomas Kühlein, Armin Nassehi, Daniel Teupser, Florian M Arend and 15 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Detecting Medication Risks among People in Need of Care: Performance of Six Instruments.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

25 authors.

Jochen Gensichen *Institute of General Practice and Family Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany Jochen.Gensichen@med.uni-muenchen.de.
Isabel Zöllinger *Institute of General Practice and Family Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-1235-475X
Ildiko GagyorInstitute of General Practice, University Hospital of Julius-Maximilians-Universität Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-7974-7603
Anita HausenKatholische Stiftungshochschule München/University of Applied Sciences, Munich, Germany.
Michael HölscherDivision of Infectious Diseases and Tropical Medicine, Medical Center of the University of LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.
Christian JankeDivision of Infectious Diseases and Tropical Medicine, Medical Center of the University of LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.
Thomas KühleinInstitute of General Practice, Friedrich-Alexander-University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany.
Armin NassehiInstitute of Sociology, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität, Munich, Germany.
Daniel TeupserInstitute of Laboratory Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.
Florian M ArendInstitute of Laboratory Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.
Christine EidenschinkInstitute of General Practice, University Hospital of Julius-Maximilians-Universität Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany.
Dagmar HindenburgInstitute of General Practice, University Hospital of Julius-Maximilians-Universität Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany.
Helena KosubInstitute of General Practice and Family Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.
Peter Konstantin KurotschkaInstitute of General Practice, University Hospital of Julius-Maximilians-Universität Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany.
Daniela LindemannInstitute of General Practice and Family Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.
Katharina MayrInstitute of Sociology, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität, Munich, Germany.
Susan MüllerInstitute of General Practice and Family Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.
Laura RinkInstitute of General Practice, Friedrich-Alexander-University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-0493-3628
Marietta RottenkolberInstitute of General Practice and Family Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.
Linda SanftenbergInstitute of General Practice and Family Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-3174-5297
Rita SchwaigerInstitute of General Practice and Family Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.
Maria SebastiãoInstitute of General Practice, Friedrich-Alexander-University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany.
Domenika WildgruberKatholische Stiftungshochschule München/University of Applied Sciences, Munich, Germany.
Tobias DreischulteInstitute of General Practice and Family Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.
BaCoM Study group

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionPeople in need of care or support are severely affected by the COVID-19 pandemic. We lack valid data of long-term assessments. We present a register study to detect the physical and psychosocial impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on people in need of care or support in Bavaria, Germany. To describe the persons' life conditions comprehensively, we assess the perspectives and needs of the respective care teams too. Results will serve as evidence-based source to manage the pandemic and long-term prevention strategies. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The 'Bavarian ambulatory COVID-19 Monitor' is a multicentre registry including a purposive sample of up to 1000 patient-participants across three study sites in Bavaria. The study group consists of 600 people in need of care with a positive SARS-CoV-2 PCR test. Control group 1 comprises 200 people in need of care with a negative SARS-CoV-2 PCR test, while control group 2 comprises 200 people with a positive SARS-CoV-2 PCR test but are not in need of care. We assess the clinical course of infection, psychosocial aspects and care needs using validated measures. Follow-up is every 6 months for up to 3 years. Additionally, we assess up to 400 people linked to these patient-participants (caregivers, general practitioners (GPs)) for their health and needs. Main analyses are stratified by level of care I-V (I=minor/V=most severe impairment of independence), inpatient/outpatient care setting, sex and age. We use descriptive and inferential statistics to analyse cross-sectional data and changes over time. In qualitative interviews with 60 stakeholders (people in need of care, caregivers, GPs, politicians), we explore interface problems of different functional logics, of everyday and professional perspectives. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The Institutional Review Board of the University Hospital LMU Munich (#20-860) and the study sites (Universities of Wurzburg and Erlangen) approved the protocol. We disseminate the results by peer-reviewed publications, international conferences, governmental reports, etc.

Indexed as

COVID-19Cross-Sectional StudiesHumansOutpatientsPandemicsSARS-CoV-2COVID-19MENTAL HEALTHPRIMARY CAREPublic healthQUALITATIVE RESEARCHREGISTRIES

Identifiers

PMID37192790
PMCPMC10192580

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.